On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 4:35 PM William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 2:31 PM David Farmer <far...@umn.edu> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 4:23 PM William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: > >> John Curran has already said that ARIN would accept a wide range of > >> esoteric network designs as justifying an initial /16, provided they > >> were presented in good faith. > > > > I would support a policy to clarify that 6RD does not justify > > a /20 or /16. > > Or... and humor me here... we could reduce the cap to something > sustainable regardless of how folks design their networks and stop > concerning ourselves with whether they're designing their networks as > we think they should. > Provide me with evidence that the current policy is unsustainable, and I could change my mind, but one /16 allocation being made by ARIN is not evidence that the current policy is unsustainable. It is not even a pattern; it is an anecdote at best. As I said, the current policy seems to be functioning as intended. Thanks. -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:far...@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
