This looks good to me. Thanks Leif.

        Eric C. Landgraf
        Virginia Tech

On May 18 18:38, Leif Sawyer via ARIN-PPML wrote:
> I guess this isn’t as much fun as TIPTOP,  but hopefully the minor changes 
> help with readability (i.e., expanding the first use of acronyms in 
> paragraphs, removing broken parentheticals, etc)
> 
> Any last concerns from the community before we ship this off to staff and 
> legal review?
> 
> -L
> 
> Leif Sawyer
> GCI | he/him | Engineer IV, CNI – Standards and Planning
> t: 907-351-1535 | w: www.gci.com<https://www.gci.com> | KL5BN
> 
> From: ARIN-PPML <[email protected]> On Behalf Of ARIN
> Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2026 1:01 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2025-1: Clarify ISP and LIR 
> Definitions and References to Address Ambiguity in NRPM Text
> 
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL - CAUTION: Do not open unexpected attachments or links.]
> 
> The following Draft Policy has been revised:
> 
> *ARIN-2025-1: Clarify ISP and LIR Definitions and References to Address 
> Ambiguity in NRPM Text
> 
> Revised text is below and can be found at:
> 
> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2025_1/<https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2025_1>
> 
> A PDF document showing the proposed NRPM edits is available to download at:
> 
> https://arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/pdf/ARIN_2025_1_diff_050726.pdf<https://arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/pdf/ARIN_2025_1_diff_050726.pdf>
> 
> You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will 
> evaluate the discussion to assess the conformance of this Draft Policy with 
> ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as stated in the Policy 
> Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these principles are:
> 
> * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration
> * Technically Sound
> * Supported by the Community
> 
> The PDP can be found at:
> 
> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/<https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp>
> 
> Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
> 
> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/<https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts>
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Eddie Diego
> Policy Analyst
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
> 
> 
> 
> Draft Policy ARIN-2025-1: Clarify ISP and LIR Definitions and References to 
> Address Ambiguity in NRPM Text
> 
> Problem Statement:
> 
> Section 2.4 of the NRPM defines an LIR but does not explicitly define an ISP. 
> An ISP is defined in the context of an LIR, but the explicit definition is 
> otherwise assumed.
> 
> Through implication and in common business practice, all ISPs are LIRs, but 
> not all LIRs are ISPs.
> 
> This proposal adds clarity by creating an explicit definition for ISP 
> reframing and aligning with the term LIR, and replaces ISP with LIR 
> throughout the NRPM as appropriate.
> 
> Policy Statement:
> 
> Update the Table of Contents, replacing ISP with Local Internet Registries as 
> follows:
> 
> 4.2. Allocations to Local Internet Registries
> 
> 4.2.2. Initial Allocation to Local Internet Registries
> 
> 4.2.3.4.2. Downstream Local Internet Registries
> 
> 4.2.4. Local Internet Registry Additional Requests
> 
> 6.5.4. Reassignments from Local Internet Registries
> 
> 
> 
> Section 2:
> 
> Rewrite the LIR definition to provide clarity and relationship to ISP
> 
> 2.4. Local Internet Registry (LIR)
> 
> A Local Internet Registry (LIR) is an Internet Registry that is a member of 
> an RIR, receives allocations of internet numbers from that RIR, for 
> allocation to its customers, end-users, and infrastructure, at a local level. 
> LIRs include Internet Service Providers (ISPs) whose customers are primarily 
> end users and possibly other ISPs. Historically in the ARIN service region 
> "ISP" was used as an equivalent, albeit incomplete, term.
> 
> 
> 
> Replace ISP with Local Internet Registry:
> 
> 2.15. Provider Assignment Unit (IPv6)
> 
> When applied to IPv6 policies, the term “provider assignment unit” shall mean 
> the prefix of the smallest block a given Local Internet Registry assigns to 
> end sites (recommended /48).
> 
> 
> 
> Add new definition for ISP:
> 
> 2.18 Internet Service Provider (ISP)
> 
> An Internet Service Provider (ISP) is a type of organization that provides 
> Internet services to other organizations, its customers, and\or individuals 
> other than its employees. Internet services include, but are not limited to, 
> connectivity services, web services, colocation, dedicated servers, virtual 
> private servers, and virtual private networks.
> 
> 
> 
> Section 3:
> 
> Replace first ISP with Local Internet Registry, remaining with LIR
> 
> This policy applies to every Organization that has Internet number resources 
> issued by ARIN (or one of its predecessor registries) or a reallocation from 
> an upstream Local Internet Registry. This includes but is not limited to 
> upstream LIRs and their downstream LIR customers, but not reassignments made 
> to their downstream end user customers.
> 
> 
> 
> Section 4:
> 
> Replace ISP with Local Internet Registry: in the following sections:
> 
> 4.2. Allocations to Local Internet Registries (Requirements for Requesting 
> Initial Address Space)
> 
> 
> 
> 4.2.1.1<http://4.2.1.1>. Purpose
> 
> ARIN allocates blocks of IP addresses to Local Internet Registries for the 
> purpose of reassigning and reallocating that space to their customers.
> 
> 
> 
> 4.2.1.5<http://4.2.1.5>. Minimum Allocation
> 
> In general, ARIN allocates /24 and larger IP address prefixes to Local 
> Internet Registries. If allocations smaller than /24 are needed, LIRs should 
> request address space from their upstream provider.
> 
> 
> 
> 4.2.2. Initial Allocation to LIRs
> 
> All Local Internet Registry organizations without any IPv4 addresses from 
> ARIN automatically qualify for an initial allocation of a /24. LIRs providing 
> a 24-month utilization plan for the request size specified may receive up to 
> a /22. LIRs holding reallocations and/or reassignments must show the 
> efficient utilization of their resources consistent with the requirements in 
> sections 4.2.3 and 4.2.4.
> 
> 
> 
> 4.2.3.1<http://4.2.3.1>. Efficient Utilization
> 
> Local Internet Registries are required to apply a utilization efficiency 
> criterion in providing address space to their customers. To this end, LIRs 
> should have documented justification available for each reassignment and 
> reallocation. ARIN may request this justification at any time. If 
> justification is not provided, future receipt of allocations may be impacted.
> 
> 
> 
> 4.2.3.2<http://4.2.3.2>. VLSM
> 
> To increase utilization efficiency of IPv4 address space, Local Internet 
> Registries reassigning IP address space to their customers should require 
> their customers to use variable length subnet mask (VLSM) and classless 
> technologies (CIDR) within their networks. LIRs should issue blocks smaller 
> than /24 wherever feasible.
> 
> 
> 
> 4.2.3.3<http://4.2.3.3>. Contiguous Blocks
> 
> IP addresses are allocated to Local Internet Registries in contiguous blocks, 
> which should remain intact. Fragmentation of blocks is discouraged. To avoid 
> fragmentation, LIRs are encouraged to require their customers to return 
> address space if they change LIRs. Therefore, if a customer moves to another 
> service provider or otherwise terminates a contract with an LIR, it is 
> recommended that the customer return the network addresses to the LIR and 
> renumber into the new provider's address space. The original LIR should allow 
> sufficient time for the renumbering process to be completed before requiring 
> the address space to be returned.
> 
> 
> 
> 4.2.3.4<http://4.2.3.4>. Downstream Customer Adherence
> 
> Local Internet Registries must require their downstream customers to adhere 
> to the following criteria:
> 
> 
> 
> 4.2.3.4.1. Utilization
> 
> A downstream customer requesting address space from an upstream Local 
> Internet Registry must document a plan to the allocating LIR for their 
> utilization to conform to Section 4.3.3. Reassignment and reallocation 
> information for prior allocations must show that each customer meets the 80% 
> utilization criteria and must be available via SWIP / a distributed service 
> which meets the standards set forth in section 3.2 prior to issuing them 
> additional space.
> 
> 
> 
> 4.2.3.4.2. Downstream Local Internet Registries
> 
> Customers must follow ARIN policy for Local Internet Registries.
> 
> 
> 
> 4.2.3.6<http://4.2.3.6>. Reassignments to Multihomed Downstream Customers
> 
> If a downstream customer has a requirement to multihome, that requirement 
> alone will serve as justification for a /24 allocation. Downstream customers 
> must provide contact information for all of their upstream providers to the 
> Local Internet Registry from whom they are requesting a /24, and utilize a 
> border routing protocol between the customer and the LIR. Customers may 
> receive a /24 from only one of their upstream providers under this policy 
> without providing additional justification. LIRs may demonstrate they have 
> made an assignment to a downstream customer under this policy by supplying 
> ARIN with the information they collected from the customer, as described 
> above, or by identifying the AS number of the customer.
> 
> 
> 
> 4.2.3.7<http://4.2.3.7>. Registration
> 
> Local Internet Registries are required to demonstrate efficient use of IP 
> address space allocations by providing appropriate documentation, including 
> but not limited to assignment histories, showing their efficient use.
> 
> 
> 
> 4.2.3.8<http://4.2.3.8>. Reassignments for Third Party Internet Access (TPIA) 
> over Cable
> 
> IP addresses reassigned by a Local Internet Registry to an incumbent cable 
> operator for use with Third Party Internet Access (TPIA) will be counted as 
> fully used once they are assigned to equipment by the underlying cable 
> carrier provided they meet the following requirements:
> 
> 
> 
> 4.2.4. Local Internet Registry Additional Requests
> 
> 
> 4.2.4.1<http://4.2.4.1>. Utilization Percentage (80%)
> 
> Local Internet Registries must have efficiently utilized all allocations, in 
> aggregate, to at least 80% and at least 50% of every allocation in order to 
> receive additional space. This includes all space reassigned or reallocated 
> to their customers.
> 
> 
> 
> 4.2.4.3<http://4.2.4.3>. Request Size
> 
> Local Internet Registries may request up to a 24-month supply of IPv4 
> addresses.
> 
> 
> 
> Section 6:
> 
> Update terminology section to reference how Internet Service Provider and 
> Local Internet Registry are used
> 
> 6.5.1. Terminology
> 
> a. The terms Internet Service Provider and Local Internet Registry were 
> previously used interchangeably in this section. Unless otherwise noted, the 
> term ISP is treated as a subset of LIR.
> 
> 
> 
> Replace ISP with Local Internet Registry in the following sections:
> 
> 6.5.2.1<http://6.5.2.1> Size
> 
> a. All allocations shall be made on nibble boundaries.
> 
> b. In no case shall a Local Internet Registry receive smaller than a /32 
> unless they specifically request a /36 or /40. In order to be eligible for a 
> /40, an LIR must meet the following requirements:
> 
> * Hold IPv4 direct allocations totaling a /24 or less (to include zero)
> 
> * Hold IPv4 reassignments/reallocations totaling a /22 or less (to include 
> zero)
> 
> In no case shall an LIR receive more than a /16 initial allocation.
> 
> g. A Local Internet Registry that requests a smaller /36 or /40 allocation is 
> entitled to expand the allocation to any nibble aligned size up to /32 at any 
> time without renumbering or additional justification. /40 allocations shall 
> be automatically upgraded to /36 if at any time said LIR’s IPv4 direct 
> allocations exceed a /24. Expansions up to and including a /32 are not 
> considered subsequent allocations, however any expansions beyond /32 are 
> considered subsequent allocations and must conform to section 6.5.3. Partial 
> returns of any IPv6 allocation that results in less than a /36 of holding are 
> not permitted regardless of the LIR’s current or former IPv4 address holdings.
> 
> 
> 
> 6.5.2.2<http://6.5.2.2>. Qualifications
> 
> An organization qualifies for an allocation under this policy if they meet 
> any of the following criteria:
> 
> a. Have a previously justified IPv4 allocation from ARIN or one of its 
> predecessor registries or can qualify for an IPv4 allocation under current 
> criteria.
> 
> 
> 
> 6.5.4. Reassignments from Local Internet Registries
> 
> 6.5.5. Registration
> 
> Local Internet Registries are required to demonstrate efficient use of IP 
> address space allocations by providing appropriate documentation, including 
> but not limited to reassignment and reallocation histories, showing their 
> efficient use.
> 
> 
> 
> 6.5.5.4<http://6.5.5.4>. Registration Requested by Recipient
> 
> If the downstream recipient of a static assignment of /64 or more addresses 
> requests publishing of that assignment in ARIN’s registration database, the 
> Local Internet Registry shall register that assignment as described in 
> section 6.5.5.1<http://6.5.5.1>.
> 
> 
> 
> 6.5.8.1<http://6.5.8.1>. Initial Assignment Criteria
> 
> f. By providing a reasonable technical justification indicating why IPv6 
> addresses from a Local Internet Registry are unsuitable.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List 
> ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml<https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml>
> Please contact [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> if you experience any 
> issues.

> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to