if specific to one country that would be fine chris. EOMA68 like HDMI and BLE is not intended for one country. it's global. --- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 2:50 PM, Christopher Havel <laserhaw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Another quick phone post. > > YedIf the problem with my idea is the word "certified" - DON'T USE THAT > WORD IN THE LOGO but require it somewhere nearby in a local language to the > intended geographic region where the device is to be sold. > > Also, the very idea of my two levels, two labels approach is to avoid > confusion. This isn't rocket science. Put away the hydrazine lol. > > On Feb 15, 2018 7:34 AM, "Jean Flamelle" <eaterjo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > nobody gets confused, world-wide, about the Certification Mark "BLE" >> > or the Certification Mark "HDMI". >> > >> > argh can't read the rest too busy, so sorry. REALLY limited time right >> > now. >> >> Don't worry, I think I understand your point of view and I'm trying to >> put it in terms everyone else can follow. At least, I hope that's what >> I'm doing. >> >> Those are pretty good examples of what I'm talking about. >> >> If someone implements bad HDMI, then I assume they'll get sued if they >> even mention the word HDMI. Likewise if a hobbyist documents hacking >> an HDMI port to connect to a chip inside an adapter that converts it >> composite video, they'll run into either geo-restrictions or legal >> trouble, if that adapter fries the HDMI port. >> >> In the US people can say whatever they want, but, elsewhere in the >> world, they'll say 18-pin audio-video port to save their butts. And, >> again, for good reason because of scam artists exploiting language >> barriers. >> >> BLE they will say custom wifi. >> >> --- >> >> Luke has mentioned that if Intel makes a card the even looks slightly >> confuse-able for an EOMA68, without being certified then that would be >> infringement of the certification. >> >> I presume HDMI has probably tested this in various courts, because, if >> a someone implements bad HDMI, they can't just get away with it by >> calling it something else. So that's another way how certification >> law, could be stricter than copyright or trademark law. But, I find it >> hard to believe patents owned by HDMI wouldn't be involved in securing >> a case like that. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk >> http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook >> Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk > _______________________________________________ > arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk > http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook > Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk