Right.  It's another reason why I think there isn't any basis for it.

> Selection comes to mind.  On uninhabited planets, sentient beings don't ponder
> this question.
>
> Quoting "Robert A. Book" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Bryan Caplan wrote:
> > >
> > > > That seems to water down the Principle to complete irrelevance, doesn't
> > > > it?
> > >
> > > Well, the notion that life is very unlikely, but happened on earth
> > > through sheer chance, does not require that earth is "special" in
> > > any fundamental physical sense.
> >
> >
> > What's the basis for the principle in the first place?
> >
> >
> > --Robert Book
> >
>

Reply via email to