may be India is the only universe he knows. :) Some times i do wonder if he is the same guy who made Satya and Company (two movies I absolutely love)
aah well, some frogs do live in a well. On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Chord <purev...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > And his point is??? Himesh and NS have more universal appeal than ARR? (He > has to remember that the word "universal" means not just all of India, but > the rest of the world). If you mean "universal" to mean India AND the rest > of the world (including non Indians), you cannot be serious in telling me > that NS and Himesh are appreciated more than ARR. And as far as the sales > argument, it maybe true that Himesh and NS sold more than ARR IN INDIA > alone....who really knows? If you count sales of their music albums AROUND > THE WORLD, ARR wins hands down, esp. with the recent Slumdog success. > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com <arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com>, > "Jahanzeb Farooq" <jahanzebti...@...> wrote: > > > > From RGV's "My Reactions to Reactions" post on his blog: > > > > 18. Why is that a film cannot have a universal appeal like music can > have? > > > > Ans: First of all it's wrong to presume that any one particular musicians > work has universal appeal. > > > > In 2 periods of A.R.Rahman in the last 15 years Nadeem Shravan and Himesh > Reshammiya's music sold much more than his. > > > > Also music in its final output pretty much has a singular emotion to > carry whereas a film has too many variables for it to appeal to all. > > > > > > http://rgvzoomin.com/2009/07/24/my-reactions-to-reactions-18/ > > > > > -- ----------------------------------- http://ramblingsoul.com http://2ic.in
