On 8/29/2009 3:51 AM India Time, _ichord_ wrote: > The fault is not Rahman's, it's our expectations. If ARR is happy > with Chiggy Wiggy, I am happy with Chiggy Wiggy. Period. I find it > amazing how many of you think a song is a let down by only listening > to a clip of it. Maybe you all have a gift of hearing the rest of > the song somehow through telepathic communication.
The point is: - the first trailor that got release was all glitter and no content. - this song's video is also the same. - the song's audio is no way a sample of OSC-ARR best works. The point is: These guys are stupid that they don't know how to make or market a film or music. Showing so much glitter, they are targetting the film on front bench audience. front benchers might not be the best admirers of ARR level of work. That is going to adversely affect the music popularity and sales and ARR will have another "good work went down the drain". -- Rawat > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "jahanzebtippu" > <jahanzebti...@...> wrote: >> i fully agree. but then may be boss should not do these type of >> projects where he has to compromise a lot for the sake of big >> budget or mass appeal. similar thing happened with Ghajini too. but >> still i must say given boss's post-Oscar image + huge budget/hype >> of project + Kylie etc etc, everyone expects him to come up with >> something extra-ordinary, something of his standards and at the >> same time mass-appealing. and chiggy wiggy is kind of a let down in >> that respect. >> >> little off topic but true that song picturization is kinda lame. >> where's that all money they have put? the set, the costumes, the >> extras etc everything looks from an average budget film. and btw if >> he is uncle than she truly is aunti since years ago :) >> >> >> - Jahanzeb
