LOL Srini! Yes, I do!~ :)
--- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Srini <saint.si...@...> wrote:
>
> I think I can explain how everyone came up with the same word. They
> simply copied from the first guy :) You know how it works Chord, don't
> u?
>
> Cheers,
> Srini
>
> > --- On Thu, 21/1/10, ichord <purev...@...> wrote:
> >
> > From: ichord <purev...@...>
> > Subject: [arr] I'm very confused about something.....
> > To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Thursday, 21 January, 2010, 2:41
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I've checked various VTV reviews abound, and not all reviews are full
> > throttle positive, which is fine. People are entitled to their own
> > opinions. But, one word that I'm seeing being thrown around by some on the
> > web to describe some of the music on VTV is "amateurish" .
> >
> > Am I missing something? The music of VTV to me is very mature, thorough,
> > thoughtful, deep, intricate, purposeful, and very crafty. I don't know
> > based on what type of perception that some people are coming up with the
> > word "amateurish. " If it was just one person who used this word, I
> > wouldn't care to mention it and wouldn't care in general, but it's a word
> > used by several (won't mention names or websites to avoid off topic
> > discussions) . Someone just recently described the music of "Hosanna" as
> > amateurish. Huh?
> >
> > Can anyone throw some light onto this? Does anyone else feel this way? If
> > you do, that's fine, I would just like to know why you think so.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
