I just got done giving a hard look at the p4 release notes, and I have to
agree with you, Chris - there are a few serious issues addressed there that
might make this one worth my while.  I'm giving serious consideration to
installing this one, depending on when they formally release it.

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of strauss
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 9:46 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ITSM 7.0.x Patch 004

I define VERY compelling as many of the current problems we have encountered
with the ITSM 7 suite patch 003 that have caused me to defer implementation
until they are fixed; I am hoping that patch 004 will fix some of them, but
I won't believe it until we install it and test it again with live users.
Until then, the application suite simply is not ready for production use,
and I refuse to inflict it upon people who are trying to get real work done
(and succeeding today with ITSM 5.5.1).

The way the patches work will continue to endanger any customizations, and
there will have to be some before we can put it into production since the
customer search dialogs fail to follow even previous ITSM apps, and do not
provide for searches on the login name - our key identifier for who the
customer is.

Christopher Strauss, Ph.D.
Remedy Database Administrator
University of North Texas Computing Center http://remedy.unt.edu/helpdesk/
-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 11:19 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ITSM 7.0.x Patch 004

Lovely.  I think it's time for someone with a big thinking cap at BMC to
take a bit of time to think up and implement a patch process that customers
WANT to follow; one that is worth the investment of time and effort.  The
current one doesn't have any sane person doing handsprings in the hallways.
Maybe they're hamstrung by some flaws in the application architecture, but
that shouldn't be the customer's problem to deal with.

I just installed patch 3, and would have to see a VERY compelling reason to
patch further.

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of strauss
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 9:01 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: ITSM 7.0.x Patch 004

Has anyone seen or heard anything further on the patch 004 developed for
Change Management 7.x and the Service Desk 7.x applications?  The technical
bulletins went out last Wednesday, and are available on SupportWeb under
documentation, but the patches themselves have yet to appear in the "Patch
Downloads for BMC Remedy Products" interface.
Rooting around in the ftp paths I found their files dated 4-18-2007, and the
readme's indicate that they will be rather involved to install, with the
added attraction of destroying the incident management task template add-on
(which has a serious flaw, anyway) and I have to assume that they will also
wipe out the Remedy Knowledge Management integrations that I have had to add
manually to the incident, problem, and service request forms.  Seems like
these application patches break as much as they fix, in their current
incarnations.

Christopher Strauss, Ph.D.
Remedy Database Administrator
University of North Texas Computing Center http://remedy.unt.edu/helpdesk/ 

________________________________________________________________________
____
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the
Answers Are"

________________________________________________________________________
_______
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the
Answers Are"

____________________________________________________________________________
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the
Answers Are"

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to