Correct.  12346 was allocated, but was then discarded before it became a
viewable Incident.

Rick

On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Ganga Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> ** Neel
> Let me be bit more clearer. Lets say I have last request ID
> 000000000012345.I am going ahead with a new ticket. I don't save the
> ticket and cancel it.
> Next I am creating a ticket and saving it then my new request ID will be
> 000000000012347 instead of 000000000012346.
>
> My understanding behind this in above scenario is I tried to create a
> instance of the ticket and the Next Reqest ID  is incremented by 1 and when
> i again tried to create a ticket again the Next Reqest ID incremented by 1
> and it gave me the number 000000000012347.
>
> Is this the way it work ?
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards,
> Ganga Prasad Pattnaik,
> ( Remedy Skilled Professional )
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ** I agree with Neel, whose reasons are sound.  The Interface_Create
> > form does not always create an Incident, which is why there are gaps.
> >
> > Rick
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Neel Guatam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ganga,
> > >
> > > When you say 'requestID generated are not in sequence' - are you
> > > referring to; for example; all the incidents created? If so, that's
> > > how
> > > it works as when you open a new incident and select a customer, it
> > > generated an incident ID and increment the nextID for that module.
> > > However, when user cancels out and doesn't save that incident, the
> > > next
> > > incident created will not be in sequence and have a gap of one. If
> > > many
> > > users in production do that then you'll see the broken sequence and
> > > it's
> > > normal. IF this is the case then I don't think you should be messing
> > > with it.
> > >
> > > Just my $0.02
> > >
> > > Neel Gautam
> > > Accenture - Chicago Delivery Centre
> > > Core Values:            Stewardship      *       Best People     *
> > > Client Value Creation    *       One Global Network      *
> > > Respect
> > > for the Individual               *       Integrity
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ganga Prasad
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 10:50 AM
> > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> > > Subject: Re: Control over Request ID
> > >
> > > **
> > > Thanks Rick
> > > In fact issue with me is that the request ID generated are not in
> > > sequence. So can we make the is possible to break the sequence or if
> > > broken then make it in order ?
> > >
> > > Thanks and Regards,
> > > Ganga Prasad Pattnaik,
> > > ( Remedy Skilled Professional )
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >        ** You can, but should do so carefully.  The nextId column in
> > > the arschema table contains the number of the next Request ID for the
> > > specified form.  Manipulating that manually is done by resetting the
> > > value via SQL command, which should only be done under specific
> > > controlled conditions, which are listed in the Remedy documentation.
> > > Failure to think through the process carefully may result in the form
> > > being unable to accept further entries until the problem is fixed.
> > >
> > >        If you want to present a different type of number to customers,
> > > or exercise more control over it, I would recommend that you create
> > > and
> > > use a different field.
> > >
> > >        Rick
> > >
> > >
> > >        On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Ganga Prasad
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >                **
> > >
> > >                Hi All
> > >
> > >                Do we have any control over the sequence of Request ID
> > > ?
> > > My understanding is that this number us generated automatically. Can
> > > we
> > > control the way it is getting generated ?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
> > > privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
> > > received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
> > > original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________________
> > > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> > > Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
> > >
> >
> > __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
> > html___
>
>
>
>
>
> __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
> html___

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to