Why is it FAT client? Why couldn't it be Chubby Client or Portly Client or even Big Boned Client? :)
Tauf Chowdhury Analyst, Service Management Office: 631.858.7765 Mobile:646.483.2779 -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Meyer, Jennifer L Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:34 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive? I expect most of the folks who don't move up to 7.5 will have to refer to the Admin Tool as the "True Windows Administration Tool" to differentiate it from the "Developer Studio." I couldn't resist.... Jennifer Meyer -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Easter, David Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:27 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive? In case you run into it, you'll also see folks use "WAT" for Windows Administration Tool. Now that it's called "Developer Studio", that acronym will most likely fade away. -David J. Easter Sr. Product Manager, Solution Strategy and Development BMC Software, Inc. The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc. My voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Meyer, Jennifer L Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:08 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive? Thanks, David. It appears I just hadn't run across the acronym before. Jennifer Meyer -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Shellman, David Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:04 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive? Jennifer, The desktop client has been referred to by many names over the years. WUT is actually an old name that has been around for a long time. Probably was used much more in the past than fat/thin client. ------Original Message------ From: Meyer, Jennifer L To: Arslist ReplyTo: Arslist Subject: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive? Sent: Apr 16, 2009 4:53 PM ** I've suddenly realized that "WUT" stands for "windows user tool." When did we stop saying "fat client" and "thin client" or "mid tier?" Are "fat" and ""thin" outmoded with today's networking capabilities, or simply offensive with today's caloric-challenged society? Someone please answer definitively, because "WUT" threw me for a loop for a couple of weeks, and I felt really dumb. I'm seriously confused at the loss of the fat client. Jennifer Meyer Remedy Technical Support Specialist State of North Carolina Office Of Information Technology Services Service Delivery Division ITSM & ITAM Services Office: 919-754-6543 ITS Service Desk: 919-754-6000 jennifer.me...@its.nc.gov http://its.state.nc.us E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties only by an authorized State Official. _Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ Dave ------------------------- dave.shell...@tycoelectronics.com (Wireless) _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" ********************************************************************** This e-mail and its attachments may contain Forest Laboratories, Inc. proprietary information that is privileged, confidential or subject to copyright belonging to Forest Laboratories, Inc. This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout. _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
