If its too Fat will BMC charge more for it, like United? On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Reiser, John J <john.j.rei...@lmco.com>wrote:
> How about the dumb client? ARText Ver 1.5 > > --- > John J. Reiser > Senior Software Development Analyst > Remedy Administrator/Developer > Lockheed Martin - MS2 > The star that burns twice as bright burns half as long. > Pay close attention and be illuminated by its brilliance. - paraphrased by > me > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black > Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 7:43 AM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive? > > Axton, > > I think I was more like this: > > RemedyWeb was the "thick web client" (applet based), (AKA "Fat web client") > > ARWeb was the "thin web client" (DHTML/Javascript based) > > WUT was the v4 Windows User Tool (Maybe also called the "FAT client". > Note it is fatter than the Fat web client by two more capital sized > letters.) > > You also had to deal with the UUT. (Un*x User Tool). However, you > might also have called it the "OMUT" OSF/Motif User Tool too. But as I > only used it a few times I really do not want to try to remember it in > a negative way. Rather I will choose to focus on the positive > memories.... It's dead. > > Then you also had to deal with the MUT. (Macintosh User Tool, was that > v3? or just v2?) Which I would call a "FAt client". (Not quite as fat > as the "FAT client", but fatter than the Fat web client by one capital > letter.) > > Did I forget any clients? I thought that there was an ARS Shell out > there too, but I can not seem to find it right now. :( > > [ It is Friday right? :) ] > > -- > Carey Matthew Black > BMC Remedy AR System Skilled Professional (RSP) > ARS = Action Request System(Remedy) > > Love, then teach > Solution = People + Process + Tools > Fast, Accurate, Cheap.... Pick two. > > > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Axton <axton.gr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > ** I've used thick client/thin client to differentiate the clients. But > > that was back in the days of arweb/remedy web (did I get that right; the > > cobwebs are getting thick). > > > > Axton > > > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Chowdhury, Tauf <tauf.chowdh...@frx.com > > > > wrote: > >> > >> Why is it FAT client? Why couldn't it be Chubby Client or Portly Client > or > >> even Big Boned Client? :) > >> > >> Tauf Chowdhury > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > Platinum > Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net<sponsor%3armisoluti...@verizon.net>ARSlist: > "Where the Answers Are" > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > Platinum > Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net<sponsor%3armisoluti...@verizon.net>ARSlist: > "Where the Answers Are" > -- Howard Richter Red Hat Certified Technician CompTIA Linux+ Certified ITIL Foundation Certified E-Mail = hbr4...@gmail.com LinkedIn Profile = http://www.linkedin.com/in/hbr4270 _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
