Sometimes you just gotta call a cow a cow... 

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Chowdhury, Tauf
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:41 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?

Why is it FAT client? Why couldn't it be Chubby Client or Portly Client or
even Big Boned Client? :)

Tauf Chowdhury
Analyst, Service Management
Office: 631.858.7765
Mobile:646.483.2779

 


-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Meyer, Jennifer L
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:34 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?

I expect most of the folks who don't move up to 7.5 will have to refer to
the Admin Tool as the "True Windows Administration Tool" to differentiate it
from the "Developer Studio."

I couldn't resist....

Jennifer Meyer

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Easter, David
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:27 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?

In case you run into it, you'll also see folks use "WAT" for Windows
Administration Tool.  Now that it's called "Developer Studio", that acronym
will most likely fade away.

 
-David J. Easter
Sr. Product Manager, Solution Strategy and Development BMC Software, Inc.
 
The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in
this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc.  My
voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a
spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software,
Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Meyer, Jennifer L
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:08 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?

Thanks, David.  It appears I just hadn't run across the acronym before.

Jennifer Meyer

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Shellman, David
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:04 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?

Jennifer,

The desktop client has been referred to by many names over the years.  WUT
is actually an old name that has been around for a long time.  Probably was
used much more in the past than fat/thin client.
------Original Message------
From: Meyer, Jennifer L
To: Arslist
ReplyTo: Arslist
Subject: Etiquette Question: Is Fat Client offensive?
Sent: Apr 16, 2009 4:53 PM

** I've suddenly realized that "WUT" stands for "windows user tool."  When
did we stop saying "fat client" and "thin client" or "mid tier?"
 
Are "fat" and ""thin" outmoded with today's networking capabilities, or
simply offensive with today's caloric-challenged society?  Someone please
answer definitively, because "WUT" threw me for a loop for a couple of
weeks, and I felt really dumb.
 
I'm seriously confused at the loss of the fat client.
 
Jennifer Meyer
Remedy Technical Support Specialist
State of North Carolina
Office Of Information Technology Services Service Delivery Division ITSM &
ITAM Services
Office: 919-754-6543
ITS Service Desk: 919-754-6000
jennifer.me...@its.nc.gov
http://its.state.nc.us
 
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties only by an
authorized State Official.
_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers
Are"_ Dave
-------------------------
dave.shell...@tycoelectronics.com
(Wireless)

____________________________________________________________________________
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum
Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

____________________________________________________________________________
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum
Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

____________________________________________________________________________
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum
Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

**********************************************************************
This e-mail and its attachments may contain Forest Laboratories, Inc.
proprietary information that is privileged, confidential or subject to
copyright belonging to Forest Laboratories, Inc. This e-mail is intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If
you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or action
taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the
original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout.

____________________________________________________________________________
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum
Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to