Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED 
Caveats: NONE

Thanks!

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 5:22 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Knowledge Management implementation (UNCLASSIFIED)

** 
If they had a previously run system to do something similar you will
need to consider migration. I remember trying to migrate files from
another KB system a couple of years ago as Remedy KB docs.
 
Scope related questions important too - what goes in what stays out what
gets public what stays internal.
 
Role related questions - who are subject matter experts - who are the
techs who would compose the initial articles..
 
Categorization related questions - to separate lets say IT related stuff
from HR...
 
You migjt also want to discuss the lifecycle of these KB articles.. when
to revise, when to retire..
 
These are the things that come to me at the top of my mind..
 
Joe

________________________________

From: "Drake, David P Mr CTR USA MEDCOM USAMITC"
<david.dra...@us.army.mil>
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Wed, December 2, 2009 10:47:24 AM
Subject: Knowledge Management implementation (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED 
Caveats: NONE

Good morning all,

We're working on implementing Knowledge Management 7.5 in our
environment.  Does anyone have a list of questions they used in their
own implementation when coming up with functional requirements.  I know
there are any number of ways to do it, just looking for a list that I
can borrow from.  Thanks

Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED 
Caveats: NONE

_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers
Are"_
Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED 
Caveats: NONE

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to