Depending on what you have used to set that field, take an active link or a
filter or escalation log and see what happens when that piece of workflow
fires...

An SQL log might be useful too..

Joe
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org]on Behalf Of Ramey, Anne
  Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 5:49 PM
  To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  Subject: Re: Curious filter issue


  **
  I checked, it's Date/Time



  Anne Ramey

  ***********************************

  E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties only by an
authorized State Official.



  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
  Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 4:36 PM
  To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  Subject: Re: Curious filter issue



  **

  Anne,



  Make sure that the field you have created is not a Date Only field but a
Date and Time field.. If its a Date Only field then your calculation should
be $DATE$*$NumberOfDays$.



  The Date Only field type uses $DATE$ and is different from the Date and
Time field type which uses $TIMESTAMP$ for setting values to it..



  Cheers



  Joe

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org]on Behalf Of Ramey, Anne
    Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 3:49 PM
    To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
    Subject: Curious filter issue

    **

    I have a set fields action that just doesn't like what I'm setting the
field to.  I'm trying to set a date field using math; I'm trying to set

    Required Resolution Date (date/time field) to
$TIMESTAMP$+(60*60*24*$NumberOfDays$)

    on some custom forms and it just doesn't work.  If I set it with another
date/time field, it works, but if I try and calculate time using timestamp,
it doesn't.  According to abydos, if I put in the calucation, the other part
of the action changes from selecting from my form to "current
transaction"--but this is not reflected on the screen when looking at the
filter in administrator.  I came up with a work around, but I wonder if this
is expected behavior, if I'm doing something wrong, or if I found a weird
bug.  Has anyone else seen this type of thing before?



    ARS 7.1

    ITSM 7.0.3

    CMDB 2.1 p4



    Anne Ramey

    ***********************************

    E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties only
by an authorized State Official.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to