But I am
Required Resolution Date (date/time field) to 
$TIMESTAMP$+(60*60*24*$NumberOfDays$)

Required Resolution Date is on the current form, but $NumberOfDays$ is from the 
selected form; it is an integer field on the form I'm searching.

Anne Ramey
Remedy System Administrator
State of North Carolina
Office of Information Technology Services (ITS)
Service Delivery Division
ITSM & ITAM Services
Office (919) 754-6521
Home Office (919) 842-5420
ITS Service Desk : (919) 754-6000 or (800) 722-3946
anne.ra...@nc.gov<mailto:anne.ra...@its.nc.gov>
http://its.state.nc.us<http://its.state.nc.us/>

RHCE, ITIL Foundation

***********************************
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties only by an 
authorized State Official.

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 11:58 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Curious filter issue

**
Anne,
The reason it's changing back to 'current transaction' is because you aren't 
setting a field on your form with a field from the search....it's an annoying 
feature, but it's there....

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Ramey, Anne
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 7:24 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Curious filter issue

**
The filter log is not helpful, it just shows the field being set to the current 
time stamp (because the value isn't being pulled from the form it's supposed to 
be because the filter is incorrectly changing to "current transaction" from the 
correct selection criteria).  I didn't grab the SQL log, I'll have to do that 
and see what it says.

Anne Ramey
***********************************
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties only by an 
authorized State Official.

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 5:56 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Curious filter issue

**
Depending on what you have used to set that field, take an active link or a 
filter or escalation log and see what happens when that piece of workflow 
fires...

An SQL log might be useful too..

Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org]on Behalf Of Ramey, Anne
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 5:49 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Curious filter issue
**
I checked, it's Date/Time

Anne Ramey
***********************************
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties only by an 
authorized State Official.

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 4:36 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Curious filter issue

**
Anne,

Make sure that the field you have created is not a Date Only field but a Date 
and Time field.. If its a Date Only field then your calculation should be 
$DATE$*$NumberOfDays$.

The Date Only field type uses $DATE$ and is different from the Date and Time 
field type which uses $TIMESTAMP$ for setting values to it..

Cheers

Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org]on Behalf Of Ramey, Anne
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 3:49 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Curious filter issue
**
I have a set fields action that just doesn't like what I'm setting the field 
to.  I'm trying to set a date field using math; I'm trying to set
Required Resolution Date (date/time field) to 
$TIMESTAMP$+(60*60*24*$NumberOfDays$)
on some custom forms and it just doesn't work.  If I set it with another 
date/time field, it works, but if I try and calculate time using timestamp, it 
doesn't.  According to abydos, if I put in the calucation, the other part of 
the action changes from selecting from my form to "current transaction"--but 
this is not reflected on the screen when looking at the filter in 
administrator.  I came up with a work around, but I wonder if this is expected 
behavior, if I'm doing something wrong, or if I found a weird bug.  Has anyone 
else seen this type of thing before?

ARS 7.1
ITSM 7.0.3
CMDB 2.1 p4

Anne Ramey
***********************************
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties only by an 
authorized State Official.
_attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
_attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
_attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to