Interesting - I checked my "Clean build" ITSM 7.5.01 - patch 0 system - and the field ID is the 303778300 as you are mentioning as the "to be imported" version.
Was this system a clean-build, or an upgrade or .. ?? Could someone have run change-id on the field for some reason? Is this the only field or are there more? HTH Robert On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Kevin Begosh <kbeg...@gmail.com> wrote: > ** > okay so I have been having ITSM upgrade issues and I have finally narrowed > it down. Basically what is happening is I am running the ITSM install and > it is trying to import .def .arx files etc.... and it is failing some > definition files because it is trying to import a form with a field that > already exists and failing saying that it already exists but the DB ID's are > different. > > Example: > > One of the installs is importing the form FIN:LoadCosts and is failing > because in the current system the field Related Cost is there, which it > should be but it is Field ID 270002018. The field ID trying to be imported > is 303778300. > > I have looked at other system the same version as mine and the current > field ID is the same as mine 270002018. So why is this form failing to > import, shouldn't it be over writing that field? > > Has anyone else seen this or run into this issue? > > Current system: > ARS 7.5 Patch 4 > CMDB 7.6 Patch 1 > ITSM 7.03 Patch 9, plus the compatibility Patch > Windows 2003 Server > SQL 2005 DB > VMWare Virtual Server > > I am trying to upgrade to ITSM 7.6 Patch 1 > > I have tried ITSM 7.6 Patch 1, ITSM 7.6, and now I am trying ITSM 7.5 and > the same issue is happening on all three upgrades. > > -- > Kevin Begosh > _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ -- If it were not for the gutter, my mind would be homeless! _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
