Would it be safe to install AIE from the Atrium 7.6 p1 onto an Atrium 7.6 p2 system to avoid this kind of thing? Would it be worth it?
Anne Ramey *********************************** E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties only by an authorized State Official. From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Jason Miller Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 3:49 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: AIE problem on new server ** Regarding Atrium Core 7.6 p2, we found a AIE few defects and have a special build of aie.exe SW00375829 - CI Class mapping functions returning errors on 7.6Patch 2 but not on 7.6patch 1. Basically we were not able to use two functions in a field mapping. For example a REPLACE nested in an UPPER. Also unsupported nested mathematical function that worked with p1 and not p2 work again with our new build. Here is an example that gets the host name of named and non-named SQL instances: {function|left($ServerName$, strstr($ServerName$,"\")-1)}{ServerName} Seems odd that you cannot do a strstr -1 to find a LEFT position. I have hope that the next release of AIE will support these kind of operations :) I didn't find a SW number for the second but here is the description: We are having a problem using AIE "External Data Store" feature in Relationship Class Mappings. After patch 2 the SQL that was begin generated to query the external db to find relationships was malformed. HTH, Jason On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:02 PM, sphilben <sphil...@mac.com<mailto:sphil...@mac.com>> wrote: ** Listers: I built a new 7.6 patch002 ARS server. Then I copied over a SQL DB from a previous 7.6 patch002 server. Everything works well except when I go to AIE. The server data in the Instances table still points to the old server. The T705 table (EIE:BackupLoadFlag) has all the data for the old server still loaded (of course) so how do I get to that table to update it to the new server? The form itself is all full of hidden fields which are not editable. I could use direct SQL but I might miss something. Is there a configuration somewhere that I am missing? Thanks. _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com<http://www.wwrug.com> ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
