your not making me "Warm" and "Fuzzy"  Claire..

I don't mean Warm and pass another Fuzzy Navel either..


On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Sanford, Claire <
claire.sanf...@memorialhermann.org> wrote:

> ** **
> My problem with that statement in the log is that it can be false!  I did
> an install on my sandbox server and it said " XXXX installed
> successfully".  We found weeks later that it had not.  Of course we found
> this out while doing testing.
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *patrick zandi
> *Sent:* Friday, August 12, 2011 9:44 AM
>
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: ARS 7.6.04 -- Installers (in general)
>
>  ** In the log I have seen the statements like "Atrium core installed
> successfully". toward end -- not exactly at the exact end.. but close...
>
> As a matter a fact:: I got booted off, and came back in to work and luckly
> for me.. that is what I found.. I thought I was going to have to reinstall,
> Praise God I found that..
>
> PLEASE don't get me wrong here:: the ARS 7.6.04.01 installer itself is
> nice:: it at lease tells me it is doing something and worked very nice..
> Rather than the (it's not doing anything.. Go to lunch... it is still not
> doing anything.. Is it hung? is it stuck? should I wait? ... Leave desk and
> go to lunch again) and then it suddenly did 1 itti bitti thing..
> I do like the ARS installer !
>
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Meyer, Jennifer L <jennifer.me...@nc.gov
> > wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>> As a matter of fact, there is!
>>
>>
>>
>> You turn the server over to the test team and wait two weeks.
>>
>>
>>
>> Jennifer Meyer
>>
>> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
>> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Sanford, Claire
>> *Sent:* Friday, August 12, 2011 10:37 AM
>>
>> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
>> *Subject:* Re: ARS 7.6.04 -- Installers (in general)
>>
>>
>>
>> **
>>
>> While we are on the subject of installers.. Is there an **easy** way to
>> know if the install *completed correctly?
>>
>>
>>
>> *completed = finished with ***everything installed
>>
>> **Easy = clear, concise, not spending hours looking through logs.
>>
>> *** Everything = all files, all required everything that makes it work.
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
>> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Tommy Morris
>> *Sent:* Friday, August 12, 2011 9:32 AM
>> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
>> *Subject:* Re: ARS 7.6.04 -- Installers (in general)
>>
>> **
>>
>> That’s just crazy-talk! Next thing you know, you will want them to build
>> and release an installer that actually works.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
>> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *patrick zandi
>> *Sent:* Friday, August 12, 2011 9:25 AM
>> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
>> *Subject:* ARS 7.6.04 -- Installers (in general)
>>
>>
>>
>> ** Now I know I am not the Remedy Engineer designing these applications or
>> their installers, however ""I have a thought!""
>>
>> BMC: Would you all consider creating your installers so they are not ALL
>> or nothing? Maybe make the installer so that it asks what you want to
>> install, then another box that says force (otherwise it checks to see if it
>> is already successfully installed already).
>>
>> The only reason I say this is one simple reason.. if the installer takes
>> up to 12 - 24 hours to run, and you do not have direct access to he server
>> itself (its console).. then your like me..
>>
>>  I login to a windows box co-located and do a CygWin or Reflection X and
>> call the display back.. but if you have ANY form of security, then the an
>> idle console (terminal service) is a kick off after so long.. 1 hour
>> usually..
>> This is a frustrating to run an install of ITSM 2-4 times to make sure it
>> finished. When if it had the checks or stages of some kind, then you would
>> not have as much work to do, and you can continue where you left off..
>>
>> Just wondering..
>>
>>
>> --
>> Patrick Zandi
>> _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>>
>> _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>>
>> _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
>> Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an
>> authorized state official.
>>   _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Patrick Zandi
> _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
> _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>



-- 
Patrick Zandi

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to