Tommy,

With all the caveats about making sure you are correctly configuring your VMs 
and you have properly
given them sufficient resources and you have properly done all the right things 
with how the network and
disc and everything is interacting with VMs  (all things that should be done 
regardless of what you are putting
in a VM)...

There is no issue with running mid-tier and server and any component of the AR 
System environment or
apps on VMs.

The DB layer can run in a VM.  We have seen evidence of large scale users with 
lots of data getting better
overall throughput on physical machines for the DB, but it will work in both 
places.

BMC itself runs with a physical DB and all AR System servers and mid-tiers on 
VMs.  This is a common
configuration in many of our customer environments.

I hope this helps,

Doug Mueller

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Tommy Morris
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 9:04 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Remedy 8.1.2 on VM

**
Just wondering how many are running the current ARS, CMDB, ITSM on VM's. My 
current hardware is at end of life and I need justification to purchase a new 
server. Our mid-tiers are running VM with no problem of course but I am 
concerned about the stability and performance of running ARS and CMDB on a VM 
instance.
Anyone have pros/ cons of going virtual?

[cid:image001.png@01CE87C8.A8D7D890]
Tommy Morris
Sr. Remedy Developer
RadioShack Corporation
300 RadioShack Circle
Fort Worth, TX 76102-1964
O > 817.415.2510
radioshack.com



_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to