Tommy, We have been running virtual for a number of years now (AR, Midtier). VMWare is the host system, which is what I would recommend. Our database is physical (MSSQL). We are running FTS with no issues once we configured FTS properly. We did have our primary FTS server overloaded, once we identified that and moved some of the load to another system zero issues. Our disks are EMC cabinets using mounted file systems on the OS which have not exhibited any issues from that configuration. We do have really good people that manage our storage arrays which is immensely helpful!
Jim Coryat Senior Software Engineer Micron Technology, Inc. From: Tommy Morris [mailto:tommy.mor...@radioshack.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 10:04 AM Subject: Remedy 8.1.2 on VM ** Just wondering how many are running the current ARS, CMDB, ITSM on VM's. My current hardware is at end of life and I need justification to purchase a new server. Our mid-tiers are running VM with no problem of course but I am concerned about the stability and performance of running ARS and CMDB on a VM instance. Anyone have pros/ cons of going virtual? [cid:image001.png@01CE87C8.A8D7D890] Tommy Morris Sr. Remedy Developer RadioShack Corporation 300 RadioShack Circle Fort Worth, TX 76102-1964 O > 817.415.2510 radioshack.com _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
