--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "oakdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 
> That's because little sleepy Holmdel has some nice corporate digs that 
> they want to keep. Prime property that could either go residential, 
> county, state or part corp/residential. They like the RATABLESS.
> 
> There's alot of RATEABLES sitting around AP waiting to go online. In 
> the meantime, everyone else is carrying the load.

And as you and I pointed out, the effective equalization ratio for
commercial properties in AP compared to that for residential property
is ridiculous. Why should I pay more, both in aggregate and as a
ratio, then what a commercial building housing restaurants, bars, etc.
pay? Why should anyone? Why should Metro's property (old C-8) have a
17% ratio when even the lowest residential ratio is more than twice that?




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to