--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> You said 90% of MEDIA not Journalists.  

Journalists are the media.

>  and whining that I hate you.

You do.

> You  can't get more specific than that.
> Yes you can; provide the link and use a non-partisan source like  
>Te Center 
> for Responsive Politics.

The information I posted comes from the Federal Election records.  
Forget sources, this is the ACTUAL DATA!!!

  
> Just yesterday I received email from The New England Journal of  
>Medicine 
> containing an overview of where they stand in the upcoming 2008  
elections.  They 
> cite exclusively from  "Open Secrets"  at The Center for 
Responsive Politics. 

"Open Secrets" would still be a secondary source.  It is not the 
ACTUAL DATA.  Unlike you, I posted the ACTUAL DATA. A secondary 
source will never be as reliable as the ACTUAL DATA!!! You won't see 
the differene no matter how many times I yell it.

> You are right that the data you cut and pasted supports your 90%  
>figure for 
> journalists, 

Thanks.

>but it was misleading because it does not  include corporate 
> media which controls what is printed in many cases. 

Nice spin.  Corporations don't vote.  Please take a picture the next 
time you see a building or corporate document walk into a voting 
booth.

The people themselves vote.  Looking at 100% (that's right, 100%) of 
the media PEOPLE (ie voters) who donated besteen 2004 and 2007, 90% 
gave to Dems, just like I said.


>Your  MSBC source admits it is 
> a  mere fraction of the  industry and you omitted "How the Survey 
>was 
> Conducted." 

No, it's 100% of those that donated.
 
  
> Many see MSBC as right leaning (_http://tinyurl.com/cbgwx_ 
> (http://tinyurl.com/cbgwx) );  

You link to some guy's blog. That translates to "many people?"  The 
guy complains about Chris Matthews, WHO WAS IN THE CARTER 
ADMINISTRATION!!!  He's right leaning!?!  Holy crap.

Do you follow media at all.  It's MSNBC (or MSLSD as we 
conservatives call it) that considers itself in a war with Fox. 
Watch Olbermann at all?

>and it is for profit, but at least a link would have shown some 
> respect for  those who read here.

You are 0 for 3 in challenging me about my sourses.  Show some 
respect for me.

> Feel free.  That just might improve the tenor of discourse here.

Everyone of these tedious fights starts with you attacking me.  You 
are the problem with tenor.

Someone other than me should tell you to stop.






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to