In a message dated 11/6/2007 11:27:38 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have always said that keeping that property in public control, for example leasing it to operators, would have been the best approach instead of a sale. In addition the Federal Historic Preservation Tax Credits available along with Preservation Grants that are targeted for public sites would have been very valuable. As it is, its all private property, Decisions made during that group-think era when privatization was supposed to be the wave and savior of the future, and all public interests were swept aside. Enron, Merrill Lynch, Citigroup et al.: So much for that idea. so why is Code Enforcement not all over them like they are with some folks ? Has that uneven enforcement question ever been answered? ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
