"Meanwhile, the graffiti (even if it is social commentary) continues
to leave Asbury stuck with the downtrodden look that it has had for
years, which leads residents and visitors to beleive that this place
can't overcome its past."
While we've had graffiti problems in the past, there is much more to point a
finger at in AP
that illustrates it's downtrodden past.
Main street for example.
Asbury Ave.
The lack of attention given to the west side because were too distracted with
the
boardwalk redevelopment.
Letting The Charms building stand there in it's current state for decades. It's
a beautiful
building that's being entirely ignored. It'll probably eventually be replaced
with something
that lacks the workmanship and character that should be preserved.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dougandcathy_mcqueen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Social Commentary: Yes
> Art: Maybe
> Illegal: Definitely
>
> To say that it's not malicicious to destroy someone else's property
> (even public property) by spraypainting on it without their
> permission is ridiculous! Why do people think its OK to graffiti on
> public property when they wouldn't want someone else doing it to
> their house? That's just as senseless as those who feel it's OK to
> throw litter in public, but not in their own yard.
>
> I get the whole social commentary thing, but where does it stop?
> What if someone else decided to undertake a vast array of other
> crimes as part of a "social commentary", like lighting fires,
> shooting out street lights, or sending internet viruses?
>
> Instead of breaking the law (for which the "artist" should be fined),
> the "artist" should seek a productive outlet for his art. I would
> suggest approaching the city or the owners of other property he's
> defaced to see if they'll pay him to do a legitimate piece.
>
> Meanwhile, the graffiti (even if it is social commentary) continues
> to leave Asbury stuck with the downtrodden look that it has had for
> years, which leads residents and visitors to beleive that this place
> can't overcome its past.
>
> Or here's another idea for an art piece: we can dress our graffiti
> artist up in a bright orange jumpsuit, and have him spend the day
> scrubbing paint from public property. This would be a social
> commentary on how everyone is contributing to make Asbury Park a
> better place. It'll be great!
>
> Just my opinion, but at least I didn't spraypaint it on the side of a
> building.
>
>
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Jack Pitzer" <hinge98@> wrote:
> >
> > But, it wasn't painted on my front door.
> > It was social commentary about Asbury Park. Not malicious.
> > I have little doubt that the person who created it is a bona fide
> artist.
> > I wish I would've taken a picture of it before it got covered up.
> >
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "oakdorf" <oakdorf@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Jack Pitzer" <hinge98@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The graffiti was art, not just any old graffiti. The first time
> I
> > > saw it, viewing it for about 2
> > > >
> > >
> > > Art it may be, but if it were painted on your front door - would
> it be
> > > art or graffiti?
> > >
> > > I agree that graffiti is art when. There was a good story awhile
> back
> > > ago about programs that took these "artists" and turned their
> skills
> > > into usefuil careers - in the arts.
> > >
> >
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
