Jack,

I am curious what type of shops should be in the pavillions so they 
aren't a strip mall?  Also, who knows if Gary is telling the truth 
but if you read the article in the tri city news he does not want to 
bring in big retailers because he realizes that is not what the 
boardwalk is about and would not create a UNIQUE destination.  So 
far i think they have done a decent job in the unique department.  
 

--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Jack,
> It is not a strip mall...yet.  Currently you have mom & pop 
retailers.  Many are residents of Asbury who want to aid in the 
rebuilding and have taken risks to create these specility shops.  
With that being said, who else would open up stores on the 
boardwalk/  This is truely the first summer the boradwalk has a 
direction and it was very late in opening.  Retail works in a 
cycles.  You will have the mom & pop stores and as they build 
customers, the retail giants then move in.  Rents go up and the mom 
& pops leave.  You see this happen all over.  If I do recall, MM did 
mention J Crew as a retailer when they were proposing the boardwalk 
rebuild.  Time will tell.   
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Jack Pitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:12:26 PM
> Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: Help Need with ReVision's productions of 
HAIR.
> 
> 
> I'm sorry that you take issue with my comment, but to me, the 5th 
Ave. pavilion currently 
> looks like a strip mall. Does it look better yes, but I think it's 
been ruined. To me, it looks 
> throw together, and not faithfully restored according to the plan. 
It doesn't even fit into 
> the classic look of CH and the Paramount, nor what the Casino will 
look like if that's ever 
> completed.
> There are strip malls in this country that have fine dining 
establishments and places like 
> you've mentioned, but they are still strip malls. They are all 
over the Miami area.
> I honestly think that people are so weary from decades of neglect 
that the boardwalk 
> experienced that people have lowered their expectations and are 
willing to accept any 
> progress without question. 
> Now we have a bandshell that probably doesn't have a future. How 
is that going to be 
> resolved? I'm willing to bet that it doesn't get resolved, because 
people are being too 
> seduced by what they perceive to be progress. Our city has also 
been lulled by the 
> seduction, and they don't appear to have the balls to step up and 
do anything about it.
> 
> --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "dsher4" <dsher4@> wrote:
> >
> > How many strip malls have places like Hot Sand, LaPlaca and two 
> > dining establishments that look out onto a beautiful beach/surf. 
I 
> > take issue with that comment.
> > 
> > I do agree, however, that the bandshell should have a future and 
it 
> > doesn't seem that way now.
> > 
> > Dan S.
> > 
> > 
> > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "Jack Pitzer" <hinge98@> 
wrote:
> > >
> > > Unfortunately I'm at work and I can't turn it up load enough 
to 
> > hear the response. What 
> > > does it say? It sounds to me like they aren't answering the 
> > question Werner posed.
> > > Meanwhile, while we're all praising MM for the amazing job 
they've 
> > done, that very praise 
> > > is going to overshadow the fact that MM went way past what was 
> > supposed to be done and 
> > > basically destroyed the 5th Ave. pavilion. Now it's a strip 
mall 
> > with expensive dining. No 
> > > bandshell. We might as well kiss the bandshell goodbye, 
because I 
> > really don't see MM 
> > > removing the heating and A/C units. And there is no way on 
earth 
> > that the one next to the 
> > > stage can be concealed or silenced in any way to make 
performances 
> > up there possible.
> > > Once again. our city drops the ball and let's the developers 
do 
> > whatever they want.
> > > 
> > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "sandpiper15" 
<sandpiper15@ > 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "Jack Pitzer" <hinge98@> 
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm wondering why this isn't more of an uproar about the 
> > current
> > > > situation with the
> > > > > bandshell.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Actually, if you click here
> > > > <http://www.asburyra dio.com/audio/ PublicComment070 
208_007.mp3> 
> > and FF
> > > > to 12:18, I think you'll find the response to Werner's very 
> > articulate
> > > > and well-founded question regarding the bandshell to be 
quite 
> > uproarious
> > > > - in a Marxian sort of way. ("That's in every contract. 
That's 
> > what they
> > > > call a sanity clause. - Ha! You can't fool me. There ain't 
no 
> > Sanity
> > > > Claus.")
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to