So instead of admitting you are personalizing, who instead reprint the quotes of others who are personalizing.
The game already ended - time to stop playing. --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In a message dated 11/3/2008 7:57:59 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > MarioAPNJ@ wrote: If you are being honest, can you say you read my > follow-up post ... > > You following post is irrelevant. We are talking about the original post. > The one that was 100% about me personally. > That's the one where I want Jenn to find any political issue. She won't > find one word about anything except your opinions of me > personally. She commented on it - let's see her take the challenge. > She didn't take the challenge of finding anywhere that I have personalised > either. > ============================= > > How is pointing out the specious and fallacious in your arguments about you > rather than about how you present a point of view? When I point out the > basis of my analyses, you call them irrelevant and then harass Jennifer to > explain my political issues with your opinion pieces. > > Your "Shameless" (your word) appeals here for us to go to Fox forums to read > your posts and see the comments you keep count of indicated that you > welcomed comments there, in that universe of self-selected like- minded readers. Why > are those comments not welcomed here from among a more diverse group? > > Anyone new here who had the time to take your challenge to find "anywhere" > in our archives where you have "personalized" would find numerous instances of > your attacking the messengers instead of their message:e.g., to a councilman > you try to link to a writer who advocates a political "assassination"; to > someone as a drunk, "Hiccup"; and to me to get out of my pajamas (which I don't > own) and get to a library to read a book -- to name just a few. > > And if you insist, as you will, that my posts about your rhetorical bag of > tricks (techniques, if you prefer) are personal, then I'm in good company. > > Just a sampling rom the past few weeks here, none of them mine: > > ===================== > > > Justifiedright LOVES to go for baiting and trolling. He has a predisposition > to misrepresent other people's > comments using 'sound bites' and twisting context. > > ================================ > > What makes you a troll, unlike Oak, is that you say things like the > below that are just downright inflammatory. > > ============================================= > > Now you are going to twist my words around? I did read the whole > article- I was referring to your selective reading. Honestly Tommy, > this is where you always make yourself look bad and why the rest of > us should never even respond to you. > > =========================================== > > Twisting words and ignoring context are the pattern. > Hard to resist the bait - that's the problem. > > ======================================== > > He posts these things and you can almost see a smug > little smile on his face when he types, then he wants to twist > everything around to try and prove some point that 95% of us would > not agree with. In a way its like a lawyering trait gone horribly > wrong. Lawyers do like to argue, but Tommy argues with twisted facts > and strange conclusions. And if the argument may end, he'll just > twist it some more to keep it going, arguing for arguments sake. It > is annoying. > > DO you remember that more recent thread about the mission? He was > saying something about how he thought Stand Up was anti-Christian or > something, and everyone's posts got all twisted around and the > argument went on forever! > ============================= > > No, it is when you say things just to get a rise out of people for > argument's sake that you are a troll. "bleeding heart liberal" nice one! > > ================================= > > You like to twist people's words, but avoid answering a direct question.... > You never did say how it is okay. I suspect that is because you know > that it isn't and just don't like to ever admit to that. > > +++++++++++++++++++++ > > And there's Maureen's call-in radio program. When a member of this list > called in with a relevant question, you deflected with the "victim" defense: He > doesn't like me. > > I've never heard any non-tabloid columnist or pundit attack the messengers > rather than their messages. > > None of us ever approached the extreme level that the Ocean Grove lawyer did > in the Coaster a few weeks back. > > There have been more moderate letter writers in the Coaster who take serious > issue with what they consider personal insults from you. And Kim Sullivan > felt your "Bully" column was so egregious that she came out of retirement from > column writing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > **************Plan your next getaway with AOL Travel. Check out Today's Hot > 5 Travel Deals! > (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212416248x1200771803/aol? redir=http://travel.aol.com/discount-travel? ncid=emlcntustrav00000001) > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
