Romain, I was just curious, it is not necessary to dig deeper. It was just an idea, I did not expect it to work anyway. Compilation errors exist for a reason. ;-) -- Alexander Kriegisch http://scrum-master.de
Romain Primet schrieb am 11.04.2015 15:03: > Le 11/04/2015 14:47, Alexander Kriegisch a écrit : >> Sounds good, Romain, I had no idea Andy was in touch with you. >> >> BTW, I noticed that if you add >> <proceedOnError>true</proceedOnError> >> to the POM of zvtm-cluster, the build continues and the necessary methods >> seem >> to be there in the resulting class files. Can you please test that with the >> official v1.8.5 (not the fixed preview) and tell me if the software actually >> does what it is supposed to? I have no idea how to test that because I do not >> know ZVTM. I am just curious if this workaround to keep the build going >> actually works or leaves behind inconsistently woven class files. >> >> Thanks in advance > Just tried the official 1.8.5 with the proceedOnError flag; this results > in a non-functional build on my machine (whereas the snapshot aspectj > produces a functional build). I'm not sure why though, I'd have to dig > further. _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
