The 'Above Average' are already in the surreal/illogical/romantic conflict:-). 
They are very few in numbers and have taken their seats either with those who 
are in governance or those who want to evict them with 'force'. Irony is, both 
sides have nothing to show. The common people with average intelligence in 
Assam understand this reality. Yet, till now the common people with average 
intelligence have put the 'colonisers' in legit governance through 'vote' and 
have spurned the 'freedom fighters'. Then why is the need for a plebiscite? Or 
UN presence will give the 'votes' credibility? Or would you say that all people 
have not 'voted' in these 'elections' or that they are manipulated/ rigged? Why 
do you think that all oxomiyas and oxombaxis would go out to vote if held under 
UN auspices? 
   
  

Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
        At 3:24 PM +0100 10/14/07, uttam borthakur wrote:
  That is what makes it surreal, and not real; beyond cause and effect; beyond 
rationality. This is bothering common people of average intelligence; they 
cannot afford romanticism.   


  

  

  **** How about the ABOVE AVERAGE, those who are in charge of their 
'legitimate' governance, and those who put them there, by their overt or tacit 
support? Can they afford it?
  

  If they cannot, as I like to think they can't, WHAT HAVE THEY SHOWN for their 
effort to bring the conflict to an end? I mean other than to wish ULFA away or 
making perfunctory noises about the Govt. acting undemocratically  every now 
and then?
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  


  
Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
    >Has anyone made up his/her mind as to what should be the objective measure 
about the stage when such a vote becomes mandatory?
  
  
  
  **** It is NOT about making some OBJECTIVE , UNIVERSAL law, that will make it 
BINDING on all those in violent conflicts, for whatever reason, to submit to a 
plebiscite.  
  
  The plebiscite idea is  a RESPONSE to the ULFA/Assam/  GoI conflict, because 
those who accept and promote Indian supremacy over Assam  CLAIM that they are 
the majority in Assam, thus ULFA ought to disappear, in a desi-demokratic 
dispensation where the numerical majority is expected to run supreme on all 
issues.  
  
  No one needs to seek a plebiscite in Nagaland, do they?  
  
  **** On the matter of numbers of lives lost in the conflict, should it make a 
difference whether it is 1,000 0r 5,000 or 10 if not 15?  
  And should it make a difference  WHO are included in it?  
  
  George Bush and Dick Cheney would love it so to preside over desi-demokrasy, 
where they wouldn't have to explain  to anyone why their armies are permanently 
placed in the NE or Kashmir , or tell anyone how many  of their own people they 
have killed or put in harms way, or  what part of their annual outlay is and 
have been expended since independence in fighting these  wars against their  
beloved brethren in Nagaland , in Assam, in Mizoram, in Manipur ,in Kashmir and 
PRODUCING WHAT  and  at WHOSE expense.  
  Apparently democracy lovers brought up under the fine traditions of 
desi-demokrasy  missed it altogether.  
  Wonder WHY?  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  At 6:34 AM +0100 10/14/07, uttam borthakur wrote:
  As I understand it, according to Sri C. Mahanta, 15000 lives lost ( I do not 
know how this figure has been arrived at... whether it represents the number of 
ULFA cadres killed or Oxomiyas killed (including those in unintended 
cross-fires), .... whether it includes all lives lost including the 
non-oxomiyas) over 29 years is the objective basis making the plebiscite 
imperative. So, that is one measure.
    
   Has anyone made up his/her mind as to what should be the objective measure 
about the stage when such a vote becomes mandatory?
  
kamal deka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  The GOI has similarly been willing to hold parleys with ULFA in order to 
hammer out a solution within the ambit of the Constitution.What is wrong with 
that ?
  KJD

 
  On 10/13/07, Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  The big vacuum of reason here I see is  this:
  
 
          IF, Assam's OWNERS, I mean other those who sit in Dilli , so wish for 
an end to hostilities
          and can't  figure out HOW, and if ULFA, the villains, declare that 
they will abide by the
          verdict of the people for whose sovereignty they gave nearly 15,000 
Oxomiya lives over
          29 years, then would it NOT make eminent sense to hold one?
  
 
  What am I missing here?  Would it be sincerity of purpose ( of a hope for 
peace), or is that yet another
  display , albeit unintended, attempt to to have it both ways?
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  At 3:57 AM +0100 10/14/07, uttam borthakur wrote:
  Living in a cave does not exclude the yearning or formation of wisdom as 
Plato would ask us to believe.  
          
 
  The right to self-determination should not be denied to any people. But the 
question is: how the stage is to be assessed where a plebiscite becomes 
imperative. Simply because ULFA says that, should it be held? That NSCN or 
other outfits have claimed parts of the present Assam, should a plebiscite be 
held for that purpose in the disputed areas? In that case there would be no end 
to plebiscite and that is a very impractical thing. Then we will have to divide 
Assam to the size of the city states and have to decide every issue through 
citizens' vote! Now we have to assess whether the stage has come. I request 
everyone here or otherwise to find an objective measure of assessment. 
Moreover, could not the protagonists of secession consider building up of the 
opinion without training their guns on the people of Assam on the pretext of 
they being spies of the 'state' etc? The covert organisations always fall prey 
to the guiles of the 'state' they fight by killing their own due to
 suspicion and sometimes intra-organisational feud. Better they do things under 
the sun taking people as their forte rather than ineffectual guns.
  
  
 
  If the majority of the people feel that they should protect themselves with 
guns, I would not oppose that. But the people do not need a few to 'protect' 
and/or'kill' some of them on whimsy on the pleas of mistaken identity, 
cross-fire etc.

kamal deka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  Rubi Bhuyan and the people of his/her ilk must be living in a cave,totally 
detached from the ground realities of Assam.They are merely prodding at the 
body of ' sovereignty' without knowing what it is all about---like children at 
a new toy in the market showroom.Rubi Bhuyan's point of view expressed in the 
Assam Net is of no consequence as far as I am concerned.
  
 
  I respectfully disagree with Mr.Nayanjyoti Medhi's opinion,voiced in this 
forum in regard to holding a plebiscite in Assam focusing solely on the 
sovereignty issue as demanded by the ULFA,who are itching to break-up a 
60-year-old kaleidoscopic federation.Why do we have to hold a 
referendum,buckling under the pressure of an outfit that has been outlawed by 
the Government ? Is Assam an exclusive preserve of the ULFA ? The right to 
self-determination,if allowed in Assam,would then be reduced to a series of 
voting exorcises,conducted every 10 years or so in order to meet the demand of 
the new generation,at whose whim the border of a country could be defined and 
redefined.It will not be very difficult to imagine the chaos,it would create in 
a polyglot,multi-ethnic and multi-religious state as Assam's,if such recipe 
were to be applied state-wide as a solution.
  
 
  Kamal J Deka
  sugarland,Texas.

 
  On 10/13/07, Nayanjyoti Medhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  Dear Rubi,
  
 
  I thought since you have been following my postings in Assam online and 
Assamnet, You would be enlightened as to what, I as an Assamese would want for 
me and my fellowmen. But it saddens me because, maybe the one interacting with 
me and the one following my posts are probably not the same person. If both 
were the same person, then you would not have written this to me. Even if you 
ask Chandan Mahanta, he will tell you that I have been one of the few in 
Assamnet who has been advocating against the kiling of our own brothers and 
sisters. Whether it is in Bhutan, Burma, Arunachal or in their own backyards. I 
have even gone on record saying that there should be a plebiscite. Preferably a 
independent one where the Government agencies has no part/role to play. I had 
requested only one condition that there should be a guarantee that the people's 
wishes should be respected. I am on record that i have been advocating against 
killing. of innocents and others equally. But then how
 would you know. You are not the one following the posts. However I would 
suggest that you see the postings in Assamnet put there by me few days back. 
You will find that it is me who wrote that there should be a plebiscite because 
a very miniscule portion of the masses have access to internet and their views 
here do not reflect the view of the masses. And that is the very reason why I 
requested you (ULFA) to go to the masses in the last post as well as in my 
reply to the letter written by you to Shantikam Hazarika, a copy of which was 
also sent to me.  
  
 
  **** Instead of discussing how such an environment be created, saying that 
the United Nations won't agree to a plebiscite, is not like plucking a solution 
from the thin air?
  ****You have put emphasis on the changes the administration has brought in.
  Pray tell me when and where did I make the statement that United Nations 
won't agree to a plebiscite. And one thing more. I have never emphasised on the 
changes the administration has bought in. Again, I ask you, When and where did 
I say that? Infact I have gone on record saying that I am disgusted with both 
the Government and you (see my reply to C Da's post) because neither has done 
anything for peace and progress of Assam (I have not seen any results in 28 
years, I have become a man from 4 months old baby).
  
 
  
 
  Nayan
  
 
  P.S: Please ask Chandan Da not to barge in and write a hilarious reply to 
what i have written coz i won't reply then.
  
  
 
  On 10/13/07, ulfa_ 1979April7 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
  
Dear Nayanjyoti Medhi,
  
 
  We have read your comments in AssamOnline. You wrote,"  "Times have changed. 
The boys are disillusioned after living in jungle camps with mosquitoes and 
malaria, killing, avoiding the bullets of the Indian security forces, and no 
real destination in sight. To the mainstream Assamese the ULFA is no longer a 
struggle for national salvation but one that keeps normal life disturbed. Is it 
not the time to rethink and ask the people what they want? The ULFA should ask 
the people if the Assamese people see the ULFA movement as a beneficial and 
healthy activity for the betterment of the Assamese people? Do the Assamese 
people really feel they are not part of India and are being exploited by New 
Delhi?

Now the final question is that whether The ULFA movement is something that is 
wanted by the people of Assam and supported by them or is it something which is 
being imposed on them."  We find that your statement is a mere repetition of 
what the unified command structure has been saying for the last twenty eight 
years.  We do not accept such views. The colonial administration has been 
trying to steer the fate of the liberation struggle of Asom to their liking for 
the past 28 years. You have put emphasis on the changes the administration has 
brought in. But, why the struggle by thousands of freedom fighters in a tough 
situation created by fifth columnists facing uncertain future is still ongoing 
has not been highlighted by you?
  The ULFA has admitted of civilian casuality  in unfortunate circumstances(viz 
suddenly appearing during firing) while conducting operations against the 
enemy. Anticipating such casualities we have publicly requested people not to 
be with the occupation forces or in close proximity of the military camps or 
otherwise.
  The murder of engineer Ajay Deka and the old woman Sabitri Rajbangshi has 
proven again our contention that the unified command structure has been 
involved in these crimes in a planned manner to malign the ULFA.  Some may not 
believe our position, but, they should not believe the unified command 
structure's assertions either.  You are talking about people supporting the 
unified structure but there is no mention of the need for independent inquiry 
into their operations leading to human suffering and deaths. Hence we find your 
views biased.
  We are saying that there are masses who want an independent Asom. We have 
demanded a plebiscite on the restoration of Asom's sovereignty under the 
supervision of the United Nations. We have declared long time ago that we shall 
accept the verdict of the people.  Pre-judging of a possible negative outcome 
of such a plebiscite conducted in a environment fee of fear, surely is not 
devoid of prejudices? Instead of discussing how such an environment be created, 
saying that the United Nations won't agree to a plebiscite, is not like 
plucking a solution from the thin air? Why do you have to be dependent on 
whether India will agree to it or not? Without gauzing the true depth what the 
majority of people of Asom wants, based on a opinion poll conducted at the 
behest of the army and the police and use of the internet voting available only 
o some town dwellers, you suggest be the decisive  verdict on the fate of the 
land and the people?  
   Is it not very childish to talk like this?
  
 
  With warm wishes
  
 
  Rubi Bhuyan
  
 
  
 
  
 
  "Nayanjyoti Medhi" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  28 years have gone by since the start of the liberation struggle by the 
United Liberation Front of Assam. Many boys have died and their bodies rest in 
unmarked graves in jungles of Bhutan, Arunachal, Myanmar and still many have 
died in their own backyards. Many are languishing in the different jails all 
throughout Assam . Many have surrendered and joined the mainstream. Not only 
the boys, with them many civilians who did not have anything to do with 
liberation have given their lives in this ongoing struggle between the state 
and the liberation army.
  
United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA) was formed on April 7, 1979 at the Rang 
Ghar in Sibsagar to establish a "sovereign socialist Assam" through an armed 
struggle. Of course, there was an initial euphoria and an unnaturally 
heightened sense of alienation because of the step motherly attitude of the 
Indian Government in the initial stages of the movement. The truth has since 
been gradually realised and that sense of alienation has died.

Times have changed. The boys are disillusioned after living in jungle camps 
with mosquitoes and malaria, killing, avoiding the bullets of the Indian 
security forces, and no real destination in sight. To the mainstream Assamese 
the ULFA is no longer a struggle for national salvation but one that keeps 
normal life disturbed. Is it not the time to rethink and ask the people what 
they want? The ULFA should ask the people if the Assamese people see the ULFA 
movement as a beneficial and healthy activity for the betterment of the 
Assamese people? Do the Assamese people really feel they are not part of India 
and are being exploited by New Delhi?

Now the final question is that whether The ULFA movement is something that is 
wanted by the people of Assam and supported by them or is it something which is 
being imposed on them.

Nayanjyoti Medhi
Advocate
Gauhati High Court

Chamber:
Satya Bora Lane, Dighalipukhuri East
Guwahati-781001, Assam

Phone:
+91 361 2416960
+91 94350 43007

Email:
nayanjyoti.medhi@ gmail.com
  ___________________________________________________________
    
---------------------------------
    Yahoo! Answers - Get better answers from someone who knows. Try it now.
  


  --
  
Nayanjyoti Medhi
Advocate
Gauhati High Court

Chamber:
Satya Bora Lane, Dighalipukhuri East
Guwahati-781001, Assam


Phone:
+91 361 2416960
+91 94350 43007

Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
  
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
  


  Uttam Kumar Borthakur
  
 
    
---------------------------------
    Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now
  
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
  
 
  
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
  
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
  


  Uttam Kumar Borthakur
  
     
---------------------------------
    Forgot the famous last words? Access your message archive online. Click 
here.  
  
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
  
  _______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
  


  Uttam Kumar Borthakur
       
---------------------------------
    Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now  
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org  

_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org



Uttam Kumar Borthakur

       
---------------------------------
 Flying to Bangalore or Bhopal? Search for tickets here.
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to