>And the extremely privileged people include you .... >and so you too do NOT represent the people of Assam
*** No I don't. But I certainly can make a case for what could WORK. Or is that prohibited because MY condition does not reflect the average Assamese's? >even though you try to establish that seccession is >the ONLY solution to Assam's problems. *** Yes, under the existing circumstances, that is ONE of the possible ways out of the morass Assam is in, but NOT the ONLY one. >Why bother discussing it if YOU do NOT represent the >people of Assam and their condition ..... is it an >American phenomenon . *** Why don't you try and answer that yourself? And reflect on how much sense your question makes. >When and where did it happen ? *** Go and ask someone in Guahati. Any old fool can set you straight. >Is >it because GOI is not willing to discuss seccession >with ULFA ? I do not know of any group approaching >GOI for a discussion (except ULFA on their >pre-condition ... but you say ULFA does not have the >final say). *** It is NOT about ULFA, it is about the people of Assam. If ULFA's plans for the people of Assam resonate with them, let them come out and register it. And if it does NOT , as asserted by certain Netters, let them register that. Let there be a free and unfetterd debate . Why is INdia and the Indian nationalists so afraid of letting that happen? What is their problem? >> ** It is illegal to ADVOCATE seccession. Try and >> maker a case for it, >> and see if you get away with it, without POTA >> crawling all over you. > >Did people boycott the general election as they did >during Agitation ? I guess boycotting election would >not invite POTA ... or would it ? *** That is NOT what I wrote. The govt. of India does NOT allow the discussion of seccession. Therefore Assam cannot have a free and unfetterd debate about the issue. If you are so sure, like you assert, that assam wants no part of seccession, or ULFA's plans for them; then why not let them register that, freely and fairly? What are you afraid of? >As a matter of fact , Advocating seccession is >illegal in your favorite country too. *** Except that no one has been wanting to secede either. The states are autonomous, unlike India's. That is the difference. A truly federal system has workeed. Why can't India allow THAT to happen? Why the fixation on a colonial empire, or the inability to let go of the zamindari mentality? >Why don't you share the proof based on which you gave >the verdict ... or are you following your Master .. >Uncle Sam. *** What are you so afraid of NHRC 's inquiry if there is no foul play? What has the police to lose? There is everything to gain from a free and fair investigation, if there is NOTHING to hide. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At 2:49 PM -0800 11/19/02, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: >--- Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Shall we have a vote on this net to reflect views >> of >> >Assamese population from accross the Globe ? From >> the >> >discussions I have seen here , not many will >> >subscribe to the idea of separation. >> >> >> ** Go right ahead. But regardless of the verdict, >> this number of extremely >> privileged people do NOT represent the people of >> Assam and their condition. >> If they did, these discussions would have been quite >> unnecessary. >> > >And the extremely privileged people include you .... >and so you too do NOT represent the people of Assam >even though you try to establish that seccession is >the ONLY solution to Assam's problems. >Why bother discussing it if YOU do NOT represent the >people of Assam and their condition ..... is it an >American phenomenon . > >> >> >> >WHO has stopped the PEOPLE of Assam in having the >> >final say ? >> >> ** The government of India. > >When and where did it happen ? Please explain. Is >it because GOI is not willing to discuss seccession >with ULFA ? I do not know of any group approaching >GOI for a discussion (except ULFA on their >pre-condition ... but you say ULFA does not have the >final say). >Do you have any information on this ? Or did you try >for a discussion on behalf of people of Assam and got >rejected . > > >> >> >> >If NewsPapers of Assam reflect people's mood, you >> >need to know that they have rejected ULFA and >> >violence. >> >> ** It is illegal to ADVOCATE seccession. Try and >> maker a case for it, >> and see if you get away with it, without POTA >> crawling all over you. > >Did people boycott the general election as they did >during Agitation ? I guess boycotting election would >not invite POTA ... or would it ? >As a matter of fact , Advocating seccession is >illegal in your favorite country too. >Try writing an article on secceding St Louis in New >York Times or even St Louis Chronicle and let us see >how FBI treats you, an American citizen , ..... even >without having POTA. > >> >> >> >> >So the people of India/Assam/AssamNet , here is >> the >> >verdict ....... what is the need of inquiry etc >> when >> >Super Supreme judge has already proved Delhi Police >> to >> >be guilty ...... based on what ..... version of a >> >shady doctor who already has a couple of criminal >> >cases pending ! >> >> >> ** A very enlightening and stimulating observation >> here. >> > >Why don't you share the proof based on which you gave >the verdict ... or are you following your Master .. >Uncle Sam. > >> >> >> >BTW you still did not make it clear why killing a >> >civillian by a terrorist organization in India is >> NOT >> >a crime but the same is a CRIME when it happens in >> US >> >... i.e. why ULFA is NOT a Terrorist Organization >> but >> >AlQueda is ? >> >> >> *** Because it is such a puerile a question. > >Nice way to escape indeed ! > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> At 2:20 PM -0800 11/19/02, Krishnendu Chakraborty >> wrote: >> >--- Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >What I have seen is that when Netters question >> ULFA >> >> >regarding their postings on this Net, there is >> >> >nothing but Silence. Don't know who is opposed >> to >> >> >discussing it freely ! >> >> >> >> >> >> *** I was taliking about the PEOPLE of Assam. It >> is >> >> the people of Assam who >> >> has the final say on matters. Not Delhi, not Bjp, >> >> not Congress, not ULFA. >> >> If ULFA wants to have its say, they will need to >> get >> >> involved in such >> >> discussions. >> >> >> > >> >WHO has stopped the PEOPLE of Assam in having the >> >final say ? Is there any move on part of PEOPLE >> of >> >Assam for a fair discussion and someone stopped >> them? >> >If NewsPapers of Assam reflect people's mood, you >> >need to know that they have rejected ULFA and >> >violence. >> >Had it not been the case the recent elections >> should >> >have reflected people's mood as it happened during >> the >> >day's of Assam Agitation. >> > Shall we have a vote on this net to reflect views >> of >> >Assamese population from accross the Globe ? From >> the >> >discussions I have seen here , not many will >> >subscribe to the idea of separation. >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >To me killing an innocent civillian is a crime >> >> whether >> >> >it happens in Assam or in USA .... is it >> different >> >> for >> >> >you ? >> >> >> >> *** Very eloquently said. I am moved. My >> viewpoint >> >> will >> >> be quite worthless in the light of such noble >> >> ideals. Maybe >> >> somebody ought to apprise the Delhi Police of how >> >> the faithful feel. >> > >> >So the people of India/Assam/AssamNet , here is >> the >> >verdict ....... what is the need of inquiry etc >> when >> >Super Supreme judge has already proved Delhi Police >> to >> >be guilty ...... based on what ..... version of a >> >shady doctor who already has a couple of criminal >> >cases pending ! >> > >> >BTW you still did not make it clear why killing a >> >civillian by a terrorist organization in India is >> NOT >> >a crime but the same is a CRIME when it happens in >> US >> >... i.e. why ULFA is NOT a Terrorist Organization >> but >> >AlQueda is ? >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> At 7:24 AM -0800 11/19/02, Krishnendu Chakraborty >> >> wrote: >> >> >--- Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> IF Indians and the Assamese establishment and >> >> their >> >> >> expat supporters are >> >> >> SO SURE that the ULFAs aims don't resonate >> withn >> >> the >> >> >> people, why is India >> >> >> so paranoid about letting the people of Assam >> >> >> discuss it opnenly, freely, >> >> >> and then hold an election to discredit ULFA, >> in >> >> >> order to bring closure to a >> >> >> savaged society? What scares India so to do >> that? >> >> > >> >> >What I have seen is that when Netters question >> ULFA >> >> >regarding their postings on this Net, there is >> >> >nothing but Silence. Don't know who is opposed >> to >> >> >discussing it freely ! >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *** The destructive actions did not >> materialize >> >> >> suddenly one dark and >> >> >> stormy night to wreak havoc on the Indian >> state. >> >> >> India knew what was >> >=== message truncated === > > >__________________________________________________ >Do you Yahoo!? >Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site >http://webhosting.yahoo.com
