K,
You have several valid points. It is pointless to argue with someone whose mind is made up and can't see the other person's viewpoint even in a flash. MY comments below are in blue and italic.
DD
Krishnendu Chakraborty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> >Did anyone claim that ULFA is aiming to destroy the
> >USA or is it that it is bad if someone destroys
> the
> >USA but nothing wrong if they destroy India ?????
>
>
>
> It was not *I* who attempted to equate Kashmiri or
> Assam insurgency
> movements to Osama BL's AlQaeda. Did I?
Definitely NOT you ..... but the question is WHY
AlQaeda is bad while ULFA is not .... you ought to
answer that.
I just tried to show that there exists a link between
AlQaeda and ULFA .DD: You need to rephrase your sentence thus- I just tried to show that there exist similarities between Al Qaeda and ULFA and I 'll agree with you wholeheartedly. Both are terrorist organizations and both are fighting for causes that only they believe in. Rest of the world thinks they are wrong.
>
>
> And WHO claimed, or implied that attempts to destroy
> the USA is bad but
> good if it is India.
Read your posting again ...
>same as AlQueda, with an
> >> aim of destroying the USA?
What does it imply ....... the aim to destroy USA is
the only thing that makes an organization terrorist
.... Else , what was the reason to bring up the
issue of destroying the USA .....
>It is INDIA that has been
> attempting to destroy
> Kashmiri sovereignty movements.
That is your view and there are many who DO NOT buy
your views. Ma! y be they ought to be shot by your
innocent friends teh perpetrors of AkshayDham and
the like.
DD: The turnout at the recent polls shows that the insurgents are holding Kashmiris hostage. The same is true in Assam as shown by the fact that even Assamese villagers are beating up ULFA agents.
>And it has been
> Indian actions that has
> given rise to Assam and the NE's myriad of
> insurgency movements. Not the
> other way round. ULFA or NSCN or the other NE
> insurgencies did not spawn
> to DESTROY India.
Same as above .
DD: What is the meaning of "did not spawn to Destroy India" ? Declaring war against India as ULFA has done in its newsletters, that too against the wishes of the majority of the people in Assam is an act of destroying India. Blasting pipelines, killing Indian citizens (that includes Assamese as well) and stopping economic progress of As! sam (an Indian state) - they are all acts of destruction. In my estimate the intent is the same as bringing down WTC with an intent to destroy USA.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site
