Title: Re: [Assam] something about corruption
>Kamal's argument does not imply that a Texan system transplanted to Assam would instantly turn a Guwahati into a Sugarland or a  Kingwood
 
Let Kamal speak for a change and respond to my questions.
It is difficult to understand your Martian logic.
Rajen
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 8:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Assam] something about corruption

O'Rajen:


Twmaleke Texasot bhori-diyei sidhai " Texas public with their religion, organizations, social values, education system, legal laws, civic values and everything that goes with it?"
xuhi loisila neki he'?

( Did you guys -NRA/NRIs - absorb all of " Texas public with their religion, organizations, social values, education system, legal laws, civic values and everything that goes with it?", right after setting foot in Texas?)


The fallacy lies not in Kamal's proposition, but in your challenge.


Kamal's argument does not imply that a Texan system transplanted to Assam would instantly turn a Guwahati into a Sugarland or a  Kingwood ( the former is a vast sprawling suburb of upper middle class professional/buisness types, home to most of our kharkhowa , desi & Chinese immigrants and natives, represented in the US Congress by the the Hammer, Tom Delay; Kingwood is a lovely PLANNED city, a rarity in the USA, spectacular, home to at least one kharkhowa netter.)


What it means is that desis, and even kharkhowas are smart enough to know that if they didn't behave, the party would be over.

Example: Singapore.

Once the top dogs in India begin to get held to account for their actions and inactions, the desi smartness would instantly become operational, just like it does when they leave the old country. And soon those who have valiantly been fighting would get the support they need to build on the goodness that is already there.

Question is WHY don't the top dogs of India never held accountable? Why have NONE, EVER, gone to prison, or get dismissed, or fined heavily or whatever?

If you can explain that in a straight forward manner, then your challenge might mean something, but not as presented above.


Think about it.

c
















At 7:39 AM -0500 5/4/05, Rajen Barua wrote:
>Bulk of Assam Govt's employees are brought over to the USA to work in one it's state,say for example,the state of Texas. Beyond all questions,one would not perceive widespread petty corruption from the same set of people,while working under the Texas systems.
 
There hides your fallacy!!. How in the world you came up with the above conlclusion?
Or let us say, you are right. What does it mean then?
If you are trying to call it Ureka, it simply means that all you need in Assam is to replace the Assam systems with the a Texas systems. Now what does Texas systems really means? Does it not include the Texas public with their religion, organizations, social values, education system, legal laws, civic values and everything that goes with it? Or you have something different in mind when you use the words "Texas systems".
 
Or if my a response seems too complicated, try asking yourself the million dollar question.
Now that you have found a Ureka for Assam or India ie Replace Assam systems with Texas systems, what to do next or how to do it?.
 
Barua
----- Original Message -----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 9:16 PM
Subject: [Assam] something about corruption

CD,
It is really nice to learn that my response has alleviated your discomfort!!! After all, of what measure is a mutual admiration society,where regards are not exchanged on equal footing:)
Game aside,I agree with you in general.Allow me create a scenario.Bulk of Assam Govt's employees are brought over to the USA to work in one it's state,say for example,the state of Texas.Beyond all questions,one would not perceive widespread petty corruption from the same set of people,while working under the Texas systems.If individuals with similar backgrounds appear to act differently within two different systems,would it not be wise to examine the difference between the two systems that may provide clues in understanding the difference in perceived corruption in Assam and Texas ? By the way,the state of Assam is used as an example only.

KJD

_______________________________________________
Assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam

Mailing list FAQ:
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
To unsubscribe or change options:
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam

_______________________________________________
Assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam

Mailing list FAQ:
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
To unsubscribe or change options:
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam

_______________________________________________
Assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam

Mailing list FAQ:
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
To unsubscribe or change options:
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam

Reply via email to