without the SETC it works but I need it to simplify the logic of a bigger macro. . João Reginato (61) 9911-55500
Em ter., 14 de nov. de 2023 às 18:08, Paul Gilmartin < 00000014e0e4a59b-dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu> escreveu: > On 11/14/23 13:58:30, João Reginato wrote: > > Gil > > > > I know it works in the way you've proposed but I need to use the SETC in > a > > very bigger macro. > >. > Please post an example showing the failure without the SETC. > > Would it be better to have two separate MACROs, one of which > calls the other? > > >> Em ter., 14 de nov. de 2023 às 17:46, Paul Gilmartin escreve:>>>> . > >>> I believe the SETC is unnecessary. How a bout just: > >>> MACRO > >>> &REST ZERO &N > >>> &REST SR &N,&N > >>> MEND > >>> > >>> START > >>> L ZERO 15 > >>> END > > -- > gil >
