the logic is very complicated and full of AIFs. So, to simplify and not repeat the same AIFs, the SETC sets the later instruction to be used at the end of the macro call.
João Reginato (61) 9911-55500 Em ter., 14 de nov. de 2023 às 18:16, João Reginato <jb.regin...@gmail.com> escreveu: > without the SETC it works but I need it to simplify the logic of a bigger > macro. > . > João Reginato > (61) 9911-55500 > > > Em ter., 14 de nov. de 2023 às 18:08, Paul Gilmartin < > 00000014e0e4a59b-dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu> escreveu: > >> On 11/14/23 13:58:30, João Reginato wrote: >> > Gil >> > >> > I know it works in the way you've proposed but I need to use the SETC >> in a >> > very bigger macro. >> >. >> Please post an example showing the failure without the SETC. >> >> Would it be better to have two separate MACROs, one of which >> calls the other? >> >> >> Em ter., 14 de nov. de 2023 às 17:46, Paul Gilmartin escreve:>>>> . >> >>> I believe the SETC is unnecessary. How a bout just: >> >>> MACRO >> >>> &REST ZERO &N >> >>> &REST SR &N,&N >> >>> MEND >> >>> >> >>> START >> >>> L ZERO 15 >> >>> END >> >> -- >> gil >> >
