Hi All,
I've
been away in the sense that I wasn't following this thread and freezed the
versions on all my boss's ISP-platform (my boss is the ISP). On my personal
server I'm blindly upgrading once in a while to the latest 2.x version and
although not the way to do it I haven't had any problems I know of.
The ISP's proxies are almost all version 1.39 so is the
one this message is about.
Yesterday I had a support call about an automated mail coming from
an AS/400 not coming through. The Sender talks to ASSP which is proxying for
another machine running Qmail. In ASSP's log it goes like this....
Oct-15-09
10:27:55 id-95275-06179 64.18.3.26 <it_operati...@sender.com> IP
64.18.3.26 (64.18.3.0/24) matches whiteListedIPs
Oct-15-09
10:27:56 id-95275-06179 [SPF] 64.18.3.26 <it_operati...@sender.com>
to: b...@receiver.com SPF: none (cache) ip=64.18.3.26
mailfrom=it_operati...@sender.com helo=exprod8og113.obsmtp.com
Oct-15-09 10:27:57 id-95275-06179 64.18.3.26
<it_operati...@sender.com> to: b...@receiver.com ClamAV: scanned 60038
bytes in whitelisted message - OK
Oct-15-09 10:27:57
id-95275-06179 [MessageOK] 64.18.3.26 <it_operati...@sender.com> to:
b...@receiver.com MESSAGE OK [AS 400 Report]
After seeing this in the log I assumed everything
went well and investigated the MTA's log which is running on another machine
(Plesk7 on Linux). I have to admit I can't really work with qmail's log and
feel much more comfortable with sendmail. Maybe I can't work with the log
because we rarely have any problems with it... Anyhow.. I couldn't
find any entries there...
Because I wasn't
getting any further there and this mail was getting sent every 20 minutes
(still trying) I decided to turn on debug logging and see if it was able to
shed more light on the problem..
14 Oct 09 13:46:20 <doing
<ICAgICAgICBBQSknDQooICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgQ2F0>>
14 Oct 09 13:46:20 <25>
14 Oct 09 13:46:20
<sq: IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x97ef1e8) l=78>
14 Oct 09
13:46:20 <doing
<ZXJpbmcgXDA1MHJlZnJlc2htZW50c1wwNTEpJw0KKCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg>>
14 Oct 09 13:46:20 <25>
14 Oct 09 13:46:20
<sq: IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x97ef1e8) l=78>
14 Oct 09
13:46:20 <3>
14 Oct 09 13:46:20 <6>
14 Oct 09 13:46:20 <8>
14 Oct 09 13:46:20
<IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x971197c) HASH(0x98f40a4) l=6>
14 Oct 09 13:46:20 <wrote: (6)<DATA>>
14 Oct 09
13:46:20 <IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x97ef1e8) HASH(0x97119a0) l=43646>
14 Oct 09 13:46:20 <wrote: ()<>>
14 Oct
09 13:46:20 <2>
14 Oct 09
13:46:20 <doing <451 See
http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.>>
14 Oct
09 13:46:20 <30>
14 Oct 09 13:46:20 <sq:
IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x9715d5c) l=49>
14 Oct 09 13:46:20
<3>
14 Oct 09 13:46:20 <2>
14 Oct 09
13:46:20 <doing
<ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICA0MTkyMS43NDEwICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIDIxMi4wICAgICAg>>
14 Oct 09 13:46:20 <25>
14 Oct 09 13:46:20
<sq: IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x97ef1e8) l=78>
14 Oct 09
13:46:20 <doing
<ICAgICAgICAgIDE3Ljk1ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgQUEpJw0KKCAgICAgICAgICAg>>
It seems this mail is
getting refused by qmail. My question now is why doesn't this show up in
ASSP's log? It seems this mail is being actively rejected by Qmail. Maybe
this calls for a feature to reject those kind of mails by ASSP but I'm
getting ahead here....
I always assumed I could get
all the workflow out of ASSP's log. Isn't this the intention?
Thanks in advance for all the response(s),
JP van Melis
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
