Why don't you tell qmail to stop rejecting bare LF's. This setting is very hard to deploy with how many broken mailers their are.
ASSP may be nice to have a bare lf feature, but maybe you can do it with a regex. As it is now, sounds to me like ASSP is not the problem, other than it may not log the bare lf. -- Scott Iphone says hello. On Oct 16, 2009, at 6:17 AM, "DSD automatisering B.V., JP van Melis" <jp.me...@gakijken.nl > wrote: > Hi, > > No-one knows why this doesn't turn up in ASSP's log? > > JP > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Jean-Pierre van Melis [mailto:j...@mirmana.com] > Verzonden: donderdag 15 oktober 2009 15:47 > Aan: 'ASSP development mailing list' > Onderwerp: [Assp-test] Bare LF's rejected by Qmail but undetected by > ASSP > > Hi All, > > I've been away in the sense that I wasn't following this thread and > freezed > the versions on all my boss's ISP-platform (my boss is the ISP). On my > personal server I'm blindly upgrading once in a while to the latest > 2.x > version and although not the way to do it I haven't had any problems > I know > of. > The ISP's proxies are almost all version 1.39 so is the one this > message is > about. > > Yesterday I had a support call about an automated mail coming from > an AS/400 > not coming through. The Sender talks to ASSP which is proxying for > > another machine running Qmail. In ASSP's log it goes like this.... > > Oct-15-09 10:27:55 id-95275-06179 64.18.3.26 > <it_operati...@sender.com> IP > 64.18.3.26 (64.18.3.0/24) matches whiteListedIPs > Oct-15-09 10:27:56 id-95275-06179 [SPF] 64.18.3.26 > <it_operati...@sender.com> to: b...@receiver.com SPF: none (cache) > ip=64.18.3.26 mailfrom=it_operati...@sender.com > helo=exprod8og113.obsmtp.com > Oct-15-09 10:27:57 id-95275-06179 64.18.3.26 > <it_operati...@sender.com> to: > b...@receiver.com ClamAV: scanned 60038 > bytes in whitelisted message - OK > Oct-15-09 10:27:57 id-95275-06179 [MessageOK] 64.18.3.26 > <it_operati...@sender.com> to: b...@receiver.com MESSAGE OK [AS 400 > Report] > > After seeing this in the log I assumed everything went well and > investigated > the MTA's log which is running on another machine (Plesk7 on Linux). > I have > to admit I can't really work with qmail's log and feel much more > comfortable > with sendmail. Maybe I can't work with the log because we rarely > have any > problems with it... Anyhow.. I couldn't > find any entries there... > Because I wasn't getting any further there and this mail was getting > sent > every 20 minutes (still trying) I decided to turn on debug logging > and see > if it was able to shed more light on the problem.. It seems this > mail is > getting refused by qmail. My question now is why doesn't this show > up in > ASSP's log? It seems this mail is being actively rejected by Qmail. > Maybe > this calls for a feature to reject those kind of mails by ASSP but I'm > getting ahead here.... > > I always assumed I could get > all the workflow out of ASSP's log. Isn't this the intention? > > Thanks in advance for all the response(s), > > JP van Melis > > 14 Oct 09 13:46:20 <doing > <ICAgICAgICBBQSknDQooICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgQ2F > 0>> > 14 Oct 09 13:46:20 <25> > 14 Oct 09 13:46:20 > <sq: IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x97ef1e8) l=78> > 14 Oct 09 > 13:46:20 <doing > <ZXJpbmcgXDA1MHJlZnJlc2htZW50c1wwNTEpJw0KKCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICA > g>> > 14 Oct 09 13:46:20 <25> > 14 Oct 09 13:46:20 > <sq: IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x97ef1e8) l=78> > 14 Oct 09 > 13:46:20 <3> > 14 Oct 09 13:46:20 <6> > > 14 Oct 09 13:46:20 <8> > 14 Oct 09 13:46:20 > <IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x971197c) HASH(0x98f40a4) l=6> > > 14 Oct 09 13:46:20 <wrote: (6)<DATA>> > 14 Oct 09 > 13:46:20 <IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x97ef1e8) HASH(0x97119a0) l=43646> > > 14 Oct 09 13:46:20 <wrote: ()<>> > 14 Oct > 09 13:46:20 <2> > 14 Oct 09 > 13:46:20 <doing <451 See > http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.>> > 14 Oct > 09 13:46:20 <30> > 14 Oct 09 13:46:20 <sq: > IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x9715d5c) l=49> > 14 Oct 09 13:46:20 > <3> > 14 Oct 09 13:46:20 <2> > 14 Oct 09 > 13:46:20 <doing > <ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICA0MTkyMS43NDEwICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIDIxMi4wICAgICA > g>> > > > 14 Oct 09 13:46:20 <25> > 14 Oct 09 13:46:20 > <sq: IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x97ef1e8) l=78> > 14 Oct 09 > 13:46:20 <doing > <ICAgICAgICAgIDE3Ljk1ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgQUEpJw0KKCAgICAgICAgICA > g>> > > --- > --- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the > only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your > developing > skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead > of the > curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > > > --- > --- > --- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart > your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and > stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
