Am I missing something here? Is the arguement that OpenDNS or GoogleDNS would resolve faster than a local DNS? (assume cached on all systems)
Steve Sent from my iPhone On 07.12.2009, at 5:28, "Fritz Borgstedt" <[email protected]> wrote: > ASSP development mailing list <[email protected]> > schreibt: >> My local resolver is going to to be the fastest for local email >> lookups, especially cached ones. > > My results are different and I DO testing. The big cache is the > strongest point in favor of OpenDNS and GoogleDNS. The Benchmark > Utility may bring you some surprises. > > > --- > --- > --- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience, > a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. > Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience, a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere. http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
