I have no idea what those 10,000 domains are, and now they relate to my mailserver use. If I could get a list of those domains, I would be happy to test them.
NameBench is for an end facing user DNS lookup, MTA's are quite different in this regard. My limited test still confirms that on average, any local DNS is going to be faster, Nh ameBench eists to promote one DNS service over another, and also for people who do not have the ability to set up their OWN NS on the same lan. Cached or not, 1 hop is always going to be faster than at least 4-12 for some RR no matter how goof they are. -- Scott * If you contact me off list replace talklists@ with scott@ * On Dec 7, 2009, at 1:01 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > I do not understand what you are trying to demonstrate here. > Do you want to show that your personal selection of some (very few) > hosts which are a completely nonissue for spam-mails is better than > the selections "namebench" is using for its benchmark tests? > (one benchmark tests 10000 top domains). > Run the different benchmark tests and then look into the results. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience, a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere. http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
