I should elaborate, and I will tomorrow, it is late. I did extensive testing the other day when I saw NameBench come out. It was not just me, it was many other people in the DNS field, people I respect.
I like NameBench, I am looking at it from a NS RBL lookup performance tool. It is failing by 200% or worse in my tests on DNSBL lookups compared to my current setup. I am not saying it is a bad tool, it is just for end users, just like openDNS. google may be more prone to working well on a MTA, ill run some more tests. Ill elaborate on the below tomorrow. -- Scott * If you contact me off list replace talklists@ with scott@ * On Dec 7, 2009, at 2:35 AM, Маллиндайн Стивен (Steve Mallindine) wrote: > Scott.... > > I think this must be the first time you've written something I don't > agree > with :-) > > If it's 'cached or not', how is your 1 hop server going to resolve a > name > (not in cache) faster than a 4-12 hop server (where the name is in > cache), > > Again.....unless I'm completely missing the point of this > discussion..... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience, a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere. http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
