On 1 Dec 2006 at 13:01, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote: > Well, the wiki lists it as an "aggressive" DNSBL, and has a description > and warning in red text about using it with 2+ hits. I am trying to put > details like this in this wiki article that you don't find in other > DNSBL lists. Hopefully this one will actually be more useful than lists > I have tried to use in the past.
Yes, that's good. Thanks Micheal. > And - if free services like Gmail would list the originator's IP in the > headers (instead of stripping it for privacy), SpamCop would block that > IP instead of Gmail's server. Eh? RBLs usually test the connecting address. Something buried in a header won't trigger a block - or have I misunderstood? paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
