No, that's right - but what I said is a part of an arguement going on between DNSBL maintainers and free e-mail providers like Gmail.
I believe the points was that submitted spam to DNSBLs would be checked for the originating IP so that would be added to lists for blocking connections from. That way ISPs could be notified by reporting services such as SpamCop (which is the better feature of SpamCop, aside from the DNSBL). -- ME2 (mobile) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Saturday, Dec 2, 2006 5:58 am Subject: Re: [Assp-user] DNSBLs that are listed in the interface On 1 Dec 2006 at 13:01, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote: > Well, the wiki lists it as an "aggressive" DNSBL, and has a description and warning in red text about using it with 2+ hits. I am trying to put details like this in this wiki article that you don't find in other DNSBL lists. Hopefully this one will actually be more useful than lists I have tried to use in the past. Yes, that's good. Thanks Micheal. > And - if free services like Gmail would list the originator's IP in the headers (instead of stripping it for privacy), SpamCop would block that IP instead of Gmail's server. Eh? RBLs usually test the connecting address. Something buried in a header won't trigger a block - or have I misunderstood? p ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
