On Monday 08 March 2010 12:56:52 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Bruno Randolf <b...@einfach.org> wrote: > > I/Q calibration was completely broken, resulting in a high number of CRC > > errors on received packets. before i could see around 10% to 20% CRC > > errors, with this patch they are between 0% and 3%. > > > > 1.) the removal of the mask in commit "ath5k: Fix I/Q calibration > > (f1cf2dbd0f798b71b1590e7aca6647f2caef1649)" resulted in no mask beeing > > used when writing the I/Q values into the register. additional errors in > > the calculation of the values (see 2.) resulted too high numbers, > > exceeding the masks, so wrong values like 0xfffffffe were written. to be > > safe we should always use the bitmask when writing parts of a register. > > > > 2.) using a (s32) cast for q_coff is a wrong conversion to signed, since > > we convert to a signed value later by substracting 128. this resulted in > > too low numbers for Q many times, which were limited to -16 by the > > boundary check later on. > > > > 3.) checked everything against the HAL sources and took over comments and > > minor optimizations from there. > > > > 4.) we can't use ENABLE_BITS when we want to write a number (the number > > can contain zeros). also always write the correction values first and > > set ENABLE bit last, like the HAL does. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bruno Randolf <b...@einfach.org> > > --- > > v2: use clamp() as Bob suggested > > Thanks Bruno, are these stable fixes?
hi luis! i think so. the behaviour before was completely broken, now it's better. but i'm not sure about that whole Cc: sta...@kernel.org thing... (sorry i've been away for a while)... i read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt but still not sure if that applies for this patch. given the current state of ath5k (which is usable but far from being perfect or performant) i think it does not really matter if this or any other of my fixes go into stable quickly or not... anyhow i personally don't mind either way and can also add the CC if you want. bruno _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
