On Tuesday 09 March 2010 15:45:58 Bob Copeland wrote: > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Bruno Randolf <b...@einfach.org> wrote: > > On Tuesday 09 March 2010 12:32:33 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> Perhaps a little more elaboration on the commit log on the impact and > >> how this helps and how much would help. > > > > ok. to stop the confusion, i'll add cc: stable. > : > :) thanks! > > FWIW, I tested the patches, and they worked well for my not-very-thorough > tests. I think there was a regression in 2.6.32 time-frame that I never > pinned down, hopefully this corrects some things. I did not test the 5211 > stuff though, that one patch is probably not for stable unless someone can > test that.
5211 is pretty much broken in my point of view anyways. i have a card with that chipset but right now i have to focus on 5414. bruno _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
