On Tuesday 09 March 2010 01:24:48 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> Thanks Bruno, are these stable fixes? > > > > hi luis! > > > > i think so. the behaviour before was completely broken, now it's better. > > > > but i'm not sure about that whole Cc: sta...@kernel.org thing... (sorry > > i've been away for a while)... i read > > Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt but still not sure if that applies > > for this patch. > > Just add: > > Cc: sta...@kernel.org > > below your Singed-off-by on the commit log entry. That list will get > spammed once the patch is merged on Linus' tree.
i understand that. the question is more if my patch justifies bothering 'stable' or not. as i said, in my point of view ath5k has several problems right now (performace and stability), and i guess nobody will be using it seriously in actual production use (does anyone?). so i think it does not really matter if this or any of my other patches go into stable sooner or later. does it? bruno _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
