On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Bruno Randolf <b...@einfach.org> wrote:
>>> > as i said, in my point of view ath5k has several problems right now >>> > (performace and stability), and i guess nobody will be using it seriously >>> > in actual production use (does anyone?). Yes, people do use ath5k in production. Some large companies. >>> 2.6.32 will be used by a lot of "enterprise" releases, I'd prefer >>> connection stability fixes do indeed go in for 2.6.32 for ath5k >> sure, as i said, i don't mind. :) > > Alright lets skip stable for this. Wow this whole line of conversation is confusing :) If this fixes a calibration bug it needs to go to stable. -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
