On 07/12/2011 05:24 PM, Pavel Roskin wrote: > Both ath5k_hw and ath5k_softc represent one instance of the hardware. > This duplication is historical and is not needed anymore.
I forgot to put RFC into the subject. If there are no objections, the patch will be submitted using the standard procedure. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
