On 3/15/06, Henry Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to mention that I do find the discussion here (appart > perhaps from the commit rights) very interesting. It is practical and > touches on a lot of interesting issues. > > So if there were a test validator WG I think we should all be > subscribed to it.
You are correct that any discussion about feedvalidator admin, or *bugs* in the APP Test Suite is inappropriate for this list. (For now send bug reports directly to me, I will be setting up some sort of tracking mechanism in the near future and when I do I'll announce them here.) For any issues that have to do with the interpretation of the spec by the APP Test Suite, I believe that's perfect fodder for this list, because if you have a server running that doesn't pass the tests then I believe we have an interop problem. "Rough concensus and running code." -joe -- Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org
