On 3/15/06, James Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/15/06, Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maybe we should we call it the IBM Publishing Protocol. > > Rudeness objection. Please refrain from making any further derogatory > remarks about any specific organization that may or may not be implementing > the atom specs.
Are you seriously denying that people didn't sit here and club things for months waiting for something they could have more control over? That makes the IETF look pretty bad, and it makes the output of this WG the product of consensus by exhaustion. I find that sort of behavior rude and derogatory, and this latest demonstration of severe insecurity over an easily revertible expression of opinion is unsurprising in the context of a group with no claim to legitimacy or openness. -- Robert Sayre
