2006/5/3, Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
What does worry me is that we're going to have implementations that don't work the way the spec outlines, so I'm definitely -1 unless that is made clear.For example, James says he intends to populate the atom:content field with HTML: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg04596.html>
That has been ruled out in PaceMediaEntries3 and PaceMediaEntries4, or am I misleading? -- Thomas Broyer
