On 5/3/06, Bill de hÓra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ie anything that isn't 'live editing'. I have a lot of doubt about that being baked into a spec, but it seems to capture what some blogging tools do.
Hmm, I've never seen one that exposed authoring feeds to non-authoring clients. I guess it's an unfortunately named appendage, but it's not fatal. What does worry me is that we're going to have implementations that don't work the way the spec outlines, so I'm definitely -1 unless that is made clear. For example, James says he intends to populate the atom:content field with HTML: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg04596.html> -- Robert Sayre "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
