On 5/2/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The entry would require a <summary /> tag, but other than that, yes. (I noticed in the pace that the <summary /> is omitted. The server would either leave that summary empty or would populate it with some default data (as it would with the author name, updated, id, etc)
So, the proposal has no way of populating a required Atom field. Seems like a rather serious flaw to me. -- Robert Sayre
